YOSHLARNING RAQAMLI MEHNAT PLATFORMALARIDA BARQAROR BANDLIGINI RISKKA ASOSLANGAN STRATEGIK BOSHQARISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22047425Abstract
Maqolada yoshlarni raqamli mehnat platformalariga ro‘yxatdan o‘tkazishni bandlik natijasi
deb qabul qilish yetarli emasligi, platformaviy mehnatni sof daromad, buyurtmalar barqarorligi, algoritmik
qarorlar, komissiyalar, kiberxavf, ijtimoiy himoya va platformaga qaramlik risklari asosida boshqarish zarurati
asoslangan. Jahonda onlayn gig mehnati ko‘lami, O‘zbekistonda internet qamrovining 2021–2025 yillardagi
o‘sishi va kambag‘allikdan farovonlikka o‘tish siyosatining vazifalari tahlil qilingan. Integral platformaviy risk
indeksi, riskka tuzatilgan sof raqamli daromad hamda barqaror platformaviy bandlik koeffitsiyenti taklif etilgan.
Shartli 1000 nafarlik pilot kogorta bo‘yicha ssenariy hisob-kitobi riskka asoslangan akselerator 12 oylik barqaror
bandlik ulushini 18 foizdan 39 foizgacha oshirishi mumkinligini ko‘rsatadi.
Keywords
raqamli mehnat platformalari, yoshlar bandligi, gig iqtisodiyoti, strategik risk, sof raqamli daromad, algoritmik boshqaruv, ijtimoiy himoya, diversifikatsiya, KPIReferences
1. Abdurahmonov, Q. X. (2019). Mehnat iqtisodiyoti: Nazariya va amaliyot. Fan.
2. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management,
43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
3. Datta, N., Rong, C., Singh, S., Stinshoff, C., Iacob, N., Nigatu, N. S., Nxumalo, M., & Klimaviciute, L. (2023).
Working without borders: The promise and peril of online gig work. World Bank. https://openknowledge.
worldbank.org/entities/publication/ebc4a7e2-85c6-467b-8713-e2d77e954c6c
4. De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labour
protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471–504.
5. European Training Foundation. (2024). New forms of work and platform employment in Central Asia.
6. Helsper, E. J. (2021). The digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities.
SAGE.
7. International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook 2021: The role of digital
labour platforms in transforming the world of work. https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/roledigital-
labour-platforms-transforming-world-work
8. International Labour Organization. (2024, March 20). Digital labour platforms can advance social justice by
focusing on worker needs. https://www.ilo.org/resource/statement/digital-labour-platforms-can-advancesocial-
justice-focussing-worker
9. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard
Business School Press.
10. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of
control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
11. OECD, International Labour Organization, & European Union. (2023). Handbook on measuring digital
platform employment and work. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0ddcac3b-en
12. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Milliy statistika qo‘mitasi. (2025, September 29). O‘zbekiston aholisining 94,2
foizi internetdan foydalanadi. https://stat.uz/en/press-center/news-of-committee/64213-zbekiston-aolisining-
94-2-foizi-internetdan-fojdalanadi-4
13. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2020, October 5). ‘Raqamli O‘zbekiston – 2030’ strategiyasini
tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida (PF–6079-son Farmon). LexUZ.
14. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2023, September 11). ‘O‘zbekiston – 2030’ strategiyasi to‘g‘risida
(PF–158-son Farmon). LexUZ.
15. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2024, September 23). Kambag‘allikni qisqartirish va aholi turmush
farovonligini oshirish borasidagi chora-tadbirlarni yangi bosqichga olib chiqish to‘g‘risida (PF–143-son
Farmon). LexUZ.
16. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
17. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable)
enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/
smj.640
18. Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review
of Sociology, 46, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
19. van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between
21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72,
577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
20. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens.
Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
21. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and
algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0950017018785616
22. Yo‘ldoshev, N. Q. (2013). Strategik menejment. Toshkent davlat iqtisodiyot universiteti.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
