Innovatsion faoliyatni moliyalashtirishda investitsiya darajasini optimallashtirish: empirik tahlil va ekonometrik yondashuv

Innovatsion faoliyatni moliyalashtirishda investitsiya darajasini optimallashtirish: empirik tahlil va ekonometrik yondashuv

Authors

  • Suhrob Turanov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15497544

Keywords:

innovatsion faoliyat, investitsiya darajasi, moliyalashtirish, ekonometrik model, samaradorlik, dinamika, empirik tahlil.

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada korxonalarning innovatsion faoliyatini moliyalashtirishda investitsiya hajmining optimal
darajasini aniqlash zarurati nazariy va empirik asosda tadqiq etilgan. Tadqiqot obyekti sifatida "Toshkent issiqlik elektr
stansiyasi" AJ tanlanib, uning 2013–2023-yillar davridagi moliyaviy va investitsion ko‘rsatkichlari asosida kvadratik
ekonometrik model qurildi. Tahlillar investitsiya hajmi bilan innovatsion samaradorlik o‘rtasida invers-U shaklidagi
nolinear bog‘liqlik mavjudligini ko‘rsatdi. Model orqali optimal moliyalashtirish darajasi 26,8% deb aniqlanib, innovatsion
investitsiyalar samaradorligini maksimal darajaga yetkazish mezoni sifatida baholandi. Bundan tashqari, maqolada taklif
etilgan dinamik optimallashtirish modeli investitsiya resurslarini vaqt bo‘yicha maqbul taqsimlash orqali innovatsion
loyihalarning barqaror amalga oshirilishiga ilmiy asos yaratadi. Olingan natijalar rivojlanayotgan davlatlarda innovatsion
siyosatni takomillashtirishda qo‘llanilishi mumkin bo‘lgan muhim nazariy-metodologik asos sifatida qaraladi

Author Biography

Suhrob Turanov


“Finance” kafedrasi katta o‘qituvchisi,
Toshkent Kimyo Xalqaro Universiteti,
Toshkent, O‘zbekiston

References

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and

the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press.

Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. The Bell Journal of Economics,

(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321

Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–

Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599

Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The Financing of R&D and Innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook

of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1 (pp. 609–639). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2

Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The Financing of R&D and Innovation. In: Hall, B. H., & Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook

of the Economics of Innovation. Elsevier, Vol. 1, pp. 609–639.

Klette, T. J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Empirical Patterns in R&D Investment and Productivity Growth: A Critical Review.

The Economic Journal, 110(463), 391–410.

Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The Economics of Growth. MIT Press, pp. 1–390.

Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: The Rate and Direction of

Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609–626.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-07
Loading...