THE ROLE OF COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN EFFECT IN CONSUMER PURCHASING DECISIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20270843Keywords:
country-of-origin effect, consumer behavior, purchase intention, perceived quality, brand trust, international marketingAbstract
When consumers choose between two similar products and one is labelled “Made in Germany”
while the other says “Made in China,” their decision is rarely neutral. This article examines the country-oforigin
(COO) effect—the influence that a product’s country of origin has on how consumers evaluate its quality
and decide whether to purchase it. Using secondary data from meta-analyses, cross-national surveys, and
the Ipsos Nation Brands Index (2024), the analysis finds that COO is a significant and consistent driver of
consumer behavior. Germany and Japan receive the highest quality ratings (4.55 and 4.50 out of 5), while
developing economies score considerably lower. The effect is strongest for luxury goods and automobiles,
and weakest for basic commodities. Across five studies, the correlation between COO and purchase intention
ranges from r = 0.30 to r = 0.45, indicating a moderate to strong effect. A regression analysis synthesized from
the published literature shows that COO perception (β = 0.31), perceived quality (β = 0.44), and brand trust
(β = 0.18) together explain 46% of the variance in purchase intention (R² = 0.46). These findings have direct
implications for how international brands should be marketed and how countries can manage their commercial
reputation.
References
1. Ahmed, S. A., & d’Astous, A. (2023). Cross-national product quality perceptions: An updated multicountry
survey. Journal of International Marketing, 31(2), 44–63.
2. Anholt-Ipsos. (2024). Nation Brands Index 2024: Annual global survey of country image. Ipsos Group.
3. George Balabanis, G., & Adamantios Diamantopoulos, A. (2004). Domestic country bias, country-oforigin
effects, and consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 80–95.
4. Warren J. Bilkey, W. J., & Erik Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations.
Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 89–99.
5. Chun-Tuan Han, C. M. (1989). Country image: Halo or summary construct? Journal of Marketing
Research, 26(2), 222–229.
6. Liu, R., & Johnson, T. (2024). Country-of-origin effects across product categories: A controlled
experimental study. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1), 112–129.
7. Rancati, E., & D’Agata, A. (2019). Effects of country of origin in product categories: A study
concerning Italy and the United Kingdom. European Scientific Journal, 15(34), 1–18.
8. Akira Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of Japanese and US attitudes toward foreign products.
Journal of Marketing.
9. Ravi Pappu, R., Quester, P. G., & Cooksey, R. W. (2006). Consumer-based brand equity and countryof-
origin relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5/6), 696–717.
10. Robert A. Peterson, R. A., & Alain Jolibert, A. J. P. (1995). A meta-analysis of country-of-origin effects.
Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 883–900.
11. Julie M. Pharr, J. M. (2005). Synthesizing country-of-origin research from the last decade. Journal of
Marketing Theory and Practice, 13(4), 34–45.
12. Martin S. Roth, M. S., & Jean B. Romeo, J. B. (1992). Matching product category and country image
perceptions. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 477–497.
13. Robert D. Schooler, R. D. (1965). Product bias in the Central American common market. Journal of
Marketing Research, 2(4), 394–397.
14. Peeter W.J. Verlegh, P. W. J., & Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1999). A review and
meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521–546.
15. World Trade Organization. (2024). World Trade Statistical Review 2024. WTO Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.