OTMLARDA ILMIY-TEXNIK MAHSULOTLARNI TIJORATLASHTIRISHDA ISHTIROK ETADIGAN SUBYEKTLAR: ROLLAR, FUNKSIYALAR VA O‘ZARO MUNOSABATLAR TAHLILI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20719418Keywords:
tijoratlashtirish subyektlari, texnologiyalar transferi ofisi, Triple Helix, texnopark, universitet spin-offi, sanoat hamkorligi, Fraunhofer modeli, manfaatdor tomonlarAbstract
Tadqiqotda oliy ta’lim muassasalarida ilmiy-texnik mahsulotlarni tijoratlashtirishda ishtirok
etadigan subyektlar tizimli ravishda tahlil qilingan. Yetti asosiy subyekt guruhi aniqlangan: tadqiqotchilar,
OTMlar, texnologiyalar transferi ofislari (TTO), texnoparklar, sanoat korxonalari, davlat organlari va investorlar.
Subyektlar o‘rtasidagi munosabatlarning uch darajali arxitekturasi (yadriy, yordamchi va muhit darajalari)
tavsiflangan. To‘rtta asosiy ziddiyat turi hamda ularni hal etish mexanizmlari taklif qilingan. AQSh, Buyuk
Britaniya, Germaniya va Janubiy Koreya tajribalarining qiyosiy tahlili asosida O‘zbekiston sharoiti uchun
Fraunhofer tipidagi aralash model tavsiya etilgan
References
1. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode
2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
2. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century
fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. https://doi.
org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
3. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing.
4. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity
modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007
5. Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When does university research get
commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424–
1447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x
6. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation.
IAU Press/Pergamon.
7. Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of
the literature. Minerva, 47(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
8. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on
the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1),
27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
9. Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H., & Balkin, D. B. (2005). Innovation speed: Transferring
university technology to market. Research Policy, 34(7), 1058–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007
10. AUTM. (2023). AUTM Licensing Activity Survey 2023. Association of University Technology Managers.
https://autm.net/surveys-and-tools/surveys/licensing-survey/2023-licensing-survey
11. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2007). The economics of university research parks. Oxford Review of
Economic Policy, 23(4), 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm030
12. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research
on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
13. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a
research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-
2370.2007.00225.x
14. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory Tower and Industrial
Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford University
Press.
15. Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture
capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005
16. Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university invention
ownership model. Research Policy, 38(9), 1407–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.007
17. Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical
assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007895322042
18. Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. The RAND Journal of
Economics, 39(2), 403–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x
19. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. (2023). Annual Report 2023. https://www.fraunhofer.de/en/annual-report.html
20. Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5),
487–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
21. Solieva, M. A., & Abdullaev, J. J. (2016). The role of managerial culture in organizations: Enterprise
manager culture and its social and economic impacts. Молодой ученый, 7(111), 986–989.
22. Mamurov, B. J., & Abdullayev, J. J. (2022). Анализ факторов, влияющих на экспортную деятельность
предприятий-экспортёров в Бухарской области. Science and Education, 3(3), 1165–1170.
23. Abdullaev, J. J. (2024). Value chain evolution: Existing theories, vision, and future trend. European
Journal of Economics, Finance and Business Development, 2(3), 1–7.
24. Mamurov, B. J., & Abdullayev, J. J. (2022). Aholi jon boshiga umumiy daromadlarga ta’sir qiluvchi
omillarning korrelyatsion tahlili. Science and Education, 3(1), 1142–1147.
25. Abdullaev, J. J. (2026). Comparative analysis of global scholarly perspectives on student adaptation
systems in higher education. Xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya materiallari, 1-jild, 229–230. Zenodo. https://
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20130965
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.