XORIJIY DAVLATLAR AMALIYOTIDA XUSUSIY INVESTITSIYALAR VA AHOLI DAROMADLARI O‘RTASIDAGI MUTANOSIBLIKNI TARTIBGA SOLISH YO‘NALISHLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20749284Keywords:
Xususiy investitsiyalar, aholi daromadlari, makroiqtisodiy mutanosiblik, institutsional mexanizm, dual ta’lim, majburiy jamg‘arish fondlari, Jini koeffitsiyenti, iqtisodiy o‘sish.Abstract
Mazkur maqolada xususiy investitsiyalar oqimi hamda aholi real daromadlarining o‘sish dinamikasi
o‘rtasidagi tarkibiy-makroiqtisodiy mutanosiblikni ta’minlash masalalari ilmiy jihatdan tadqiq etilgan. Investitsiya
jarayonlarining yuqori qo‘shilgan qiymatli ish o‘rinlarini yaratish, bandlik tuzilmasini transformatsiya qilish
hamda mehnat unumdorligini oshirish orqali aholi farovonligiga ta’sir ko‘rsatish mexanizmlari ochib berilgan.
Tadqiqotda iqtisodiyoti rivojlangan xorijiy davlatlar – Germaniya, Singapur, Yaponiya va Rossiyaning xususiy
kapital samaradorligi hamda daromadlar taqsimoti muvozanatini saqlash borasidagi institutsional strategiyalari
qiyosiy o‘rganilgan. Tahlillar natijasida milliy iqtisodiyotning investitsiyaviy jozibadorligini oshirish bilan bir
qatorda, aholi moddiy farovonligining tizimli o‘sishini kafolatlovchi konseptual yondashuvlar va ilmiy-amaliy
tavsiyalar majmuasi ishlab chiqilgan.
References
1. Altukhov, A. I., & Dudin, M. N. (2023). Structural transformation of private investments under economic
sanctions. Russian Journal of Economics, 9(2), 145–162.
2. Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press.
3. Central Provident Fund Board. (2024). Annual report on savings and investment infrastructure in
Singapore. CPF Publications.
4. Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). (2025). Wages and labour costs: Sustainable economic
equilibrium through collective bargaining. Destatis Publishing.
5. Franz, W. (2021). Will the German dual system survive the digital transformation? Springer.
6. Keyns, D. M. (2018). Bandlik, foiz va pulning umumiy nazariyasi (O‘zbekcha tarjima). Iqtisodiyot va
Moliya nashriyoti.
7. Krugman, P. (2022). Arguing with zombies: Economics, politics, and the fight for a better future. W. W.
Norton & Company.
8. Lim, C. Y. (2022). Singapore’s economic development: Policy levers for balancing investment rents and
household incomes. World Scientific Publishing.
9. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan. (2025). Japan statistical yearbook: Corporate
profitability and wage dynamics (Shunto processes). Statistics Bureau.
10. Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Belknap Press.
11. Schumpeter, J. A. (2021). The theory of economic development. Routledge.
12. Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. Allen
Lane.
13. Tan, H. B., & Low, S. F. (2023). Central Provident Fund as a macro-stabilizer of investment flows and
social equity in Singapore. Journal of Asian Economics, 44(3), 210–229.
14. Vashchekina, I. V. (2024). Mechanisms for balancing private capital flows and real disposable income
of households in the Russian Federation. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 11(1), 56–74.
15. Yoshino, N., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2023). Corporate paternalism and investment efficiency: Lessons
from the Japanese macroeconomic model. Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.