O‘ZBEKISTONDA UY-JOY QURILISHI KLASTERLARINI SHAKLLANTIRISH VA TARMOQNI 2032-YILGACHA RIVOJLANTIRISHNI PROGNOZLASH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21033487Keywords:
uy-joy qurilishi, hududiy klaster, qo‘shilgan qiymat zanjiri, davlat-xususiy sheriklik, urbanizatsiya, qurilish materiallari, ekonometrik prognozlash, hududiy rivojlanishAbstract
O‘zbekistonda uy-joy qurilishini hududiy klasterlar asosida rivojlantirish hamda tarmoqning
2032-yilgacha bo‘lgan istiqbolli parametrlarini prognozlashning nazariy, uslubiy va amaliy jihatlari tadqiq etilgan.
Uy-joy qurilishi alohida bino barpo etish jarayoni sifatida emas, balki hududiy rejalashtirish, moliyalashtirish,
loyihalash, qurilish materiallarini ishlab chiqarish, qurilish-montaj ishlarini amalga oshirish, texnik nazorat va
sertifikatlash, foydalanishga topshirish hamda ekspluatatsiya bosqichlarini qamrab oluvchi kompleks iqtisodiy
tizim sifatida talqin etilgan. Tadqiqotda tizimli va qiyosiy tahlil, dinamik qatorlar tahlili, omilli va SWOT-tahlil,
ekspert baholash, korrelyatsion-regression tahlil, iqtisodiy-matematik modellashtirish, prognozlash hamda
ehtimoliy-adaptiv yondashuvlardan foydalanilgan. Hududiy uy-joy qurilishi klasterining xomashyo qazib oluvchi
korxonalar, qurilish materiallari ishlab chiqaruvchilar, loyiha va pudrat tashkilotlari, bank-moliya institutlari,
davlat organlari, ilmiy muassasalar, logistika va servis kompaniyalari hamda iste’molchilardan iborat modeli
asoslab berilgan. Klasterlash transport va tranzaksiya xarajatlarini kamaytirish, mahalliylashtirish darajasini
oshirish, innovatsiyalarni tezkor joriy etish, davlat-xususiy sheriklikni rivojlantirish hamda qo‘shilgan qiymatning
asosiy qismini hududda saqlab qolishga xizmat qilishi asoslangan. Shuningdek, 2032-yilgacha ishlab chiqilgan
prognoz ko‘rsatkichlarining ishlab chiqarish quvvatlari, investitsiya dasturlari va qurilish materiallariga bo‘lgan
talabni rejalashtirishdagi amaliy ahamiyati yoritilgan
References
1. Easthope H., van den Nouwelant R., Thompson S. Apartment Ownership Around the World: Focusing
on Credible Outcomes Rather than Ideal Systems // Cities. – 2020. – Vol. 97. – Article 102463. – DOI:
10.1016/j.cities.2019.102463.
2. Sherry C., Conaglen M. Equitable High-Density Housing: Fiduciary Duties in Developer-Negotiated Body
Corporate Contracts // Sydney Law Review. – Accepted/In Press.
3. Harris D.C., Patterson G. Condominium to the Country: The Sprawl of Ownership within Private Local
Government in British Columbia // Law & Social Inquiry. – 2023.
4. Lippert R.K., Treffers S. Condominium Governance and Law in Global Urban Context. – London: Routledge,
2021. – DOI: 10.4324/9781003141600.
5. Graham N., Davies M., Godden L. The Routledge Handbook of Property, Law and Society. – London:
Routledge, 2022. – DOI: 10.4324/9781003139614.
6. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership
Structure // Journal of Financial Economics. – 1976. – Vol. 3, No. 4. – P. 305–360.
7. Smets P., van Lindert P. Sustainable Housing and the Urban Poor // International Journal of Urban
Sustainable Development. – 2016. – Vol. 8, No. 1. – P. 1–9. – DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2016.1168825.
8. Ganapati S. Housing Cooperatives in the Developing World // Affordable Housing in the Urban Global
South: Seeking Sustainable Solutions. – London: Routledge/Earthscan, 2014. – P. 102–116.
9. Plummer J., Heymans C. Focusing Partnerships: A Sourcebook for Municipal Capacity Building in Public-
Private Partnerships. – London; Sterling, VA, 2002.
10. Ostrom E. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. –
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010
11. Muth R.F. A Vintage Model of the Housing Stock // Papers in Regional Science. – 1973. – No. 1. – P.
141–156. – DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1973.tb01909.x.
12. Malone T., Redfearn C.L. To Measure Globally, Aggregate Locally: Urban Land, Submarkets, and
Biased Estimates of the Housing Stock // Real Estate Economics. – 2022. – No. 3. – P. 656–671. – DOI:
10.1111/1540-6229.12316.
13. Fraser A., Sertyesilisik B., Rostron J. The United Kingdom Government’s Policy for Reducing Carbon
Emissions from Housing Stock by 2050 // Environmental Quality Management. – 2009. – P. 29–43. – DOI:
10.1002/tqem.20223.
14. Asaul A.N. Ekonomika nedvizhimosti. – 2-nashr. – Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2007.
15. Asaul A.N., Asylbayev A.B., Niyazaliyeva K.N., Asaul M.A. Dinamika razvitiya zhilishchnogo fonda v
usloviyakh prognoziruyemogo demograficheskogo rosta v gosudarstvakh-chlenakh EAES // Zhilishchnye
strategii. – 2021. – Vol. 8, No. 4. – P. 343–362. – DOI: 10.18334/zhs.8.4.113688.
16. Nurimbetov R.I., Kakhramonov Kh.Sh. Introduction of Digital Technologies in the Sphere of Housing Stock
Management in the Republic of Uzbekistan // Theoretical & Applied Science. – 2021. – No. 5(97). – P.
386–390. – DOI: 10.15863/TAS.2021.05.97.63.
17. Metyakubov A.D., Nurimbetov R.I. Advanced Housing Fund Management System as a Tool for Improving
Delivery of Municipal Services on Client Satisfaction // PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/
Egyptology. – 2020. – No. 6. – P. 3177–3188.
18. Sultanov A. Prospective Foreign Experience Outcome Implementations of Housing Fund Management
in Uzbekistan // Theoretical & Applied Science. – 2020. – No. 4(84). – P. 201–207. – DOI: 10.15863/
TAS.2020.04.84.36.
19. Kholmurodov R. Foreign Experiences of Improving the Organizational and Economic Mechanism of
Managing the Housing Stock // Economics and Innovative Technologies. – 2023. – Vol. 11. – No. 3. – P.
142–153. – DOI: 10.55439/EIT/vol11_iss3/i15.
20. Usmonov M.A. O‘zbekistonda uy-joy qurilishini rivojlantirish metodologiyasini takomillashtirish: iqtisodiyot
fanlari doktori (DSc) dissertatsiyasi tadqiqoti. – Toshkent, 2026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.