HUDUDIY IQTISODIY TIZIMNI INNOVATSION BOSHQARISHDA “INNOVATSION EKOTIZIM”KONSEPSIYASI ASOSIDA ICHKI VA TASHQI MUHITLAR OʻRTASIDAGI DINAMIK OʻZARO TAʼSIRLARNI BAHOLASH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22178625Abstract
Hududlarning barqaror rivojlanishi mahalliy davlat hokimlik organlarining innovatsion klasterlar,
raqamli transformatsiya va barqaror rivojlanish omillarini yaxlit tizim sifatida boshqara olish qobiliyatiga bogʻliq.
Maqolada Oʻzbekistonning 14 hududi boʻyicha 2016–2024-yillarni qamrab olgan panel maʼlumotlar asosida
Fixed Effects (FE) regressiya modeli, hudud darajasida klasterlangan standart xatolar hamda multikollinearlikni
tekshirish uchun VIF testidan foydalanildi. Multikollinearlik VIF testi orqali, oʻzgaruvchilarning barqarorligi esa panel
statsionarlik (Fisher turidagi ADF) testi orqali tekshirildi. Tahlil natijalari innovatsion faoliyat koʻrsatkichlarining
hududiy iqtisodiy natijaga barqaror va statistik ahamiyatli ijobiy taʼsirini tasdiqladi, shuningdek, ekotizim
elementlarining alohida emas, balki birgalikdagi (kompozit indeks shaklidagi) taʼsiri alohida koʻrsatkichlarga
nisbatan ancha kuchliroq ekanligi aniqlandi. Olingan xulosalar asosida hududlarni innovatsion boshqarish modeli
“innovatsion ekotizim” konsepsiyasi doirasida takomillashtirildi
Keywords
innovatsion ekotizim, hududiy iqtisodiy tizim, innovatsion boshqaruv, panel maʼlumotlar tahlili, raqamli-innovatsion, innovatsion salohiyat, R&D, panel statsionarlik testi, Global innovatsiyalar indeksiReferences
1. Acquaye, A., Patro, P.K., Quaye, E., et al. Bridging technological innovation and socio-technical
transitions: A generative AI model for predicting circular economy readiness. Technology in Society, Volume 87,
August 2026, 103359.
2. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2026-yil 16-fevraldagi “Mamlakat taraqqiyotining 2030-yilgacha
moʻljallangan ustuvor yoʻnalishlari doirasida islohotlarni izchil davom ettirish va yangi bosqichga olib chiqishning
qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-21-son Farmoni // URL: https://www.lex.uz/uz/docs/-8050769
3. Lina Pileliene & Giedrius Jucevicius, “A Decade of Innovation Ecosystem Development: Bibliometric
Review of Scopus Database”. Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-26, November 2023.
4. Iryna Pidorycheva, Hanna Shevtsova, et al. A Conceptual Framework for Developing of Regional
Innovation Ecosystems. European Journal of Sustainable Development (2020), 9, 3, 626-640. ISSN: 2239-
5938. Doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p626.
5. Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. The role of the Regional Innovation System approach in
contemporary regional policy: is it still relevant in a globalised world? In Regions and innovation policies in
Europe (pp. 12-29). Edward Elgar Publishing.
6. Morisson, A., & Doussineau, M. Smart Specialisation Strategies and Mission-oriented Approach: Bridging
Theory and Practice. Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management-ULB.
7. Pinto, H., Laranja, M., Uyarra, E. Smart specialization, public authorities, and innovation intermediaries
in developing regions. Regional Sustainability, 2024.
8. Kim, K., Ferrante, C., & Kogler, D. F. (2024). Smart Specialisation Strategies and Regional Knowledge
Spaces. Regional Studies, 58(12), 2501-2517.
9. Pang, H., Jiang, Y., Wu, L., Wang, L. Optimizing regional innovation ecosystems through actorenvironment
coevolution: A dynamic configurational analysis from a CAS perspective. PLoS One. 2026 Jan
21;21(1):e0341011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341011.
10. Gashi, K., Usaj, V., Bibiqaj, A., et al. Digital transformation as a catalyst for green innovation: An
examination of SMEs from developing economies. Green Technologies and Sustainability, Volume 4, Issue 3,
July 2026, 100403.
11. Zhang, H., Liu, H., Chen, R. Multilayer innovation network resilience: A framework for digital economy
vulnerability assessment. iScience. PMCID: PMC12765178. 2025 Dec 1;29(1):114295. doi: 10.1016/j.
isci.2025.114295.
12. Olaniyan, F.A., Ipinnaiye, O. Sustainable regional development in a resource-rich region: The case for
social innovation. Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
13. Dooranov, A., Kang, F., Rasulova, N., et al. Adaptation of strategic innovation management to regional
sustainable development: Lessons from global SMEs and the DCT approach. Social Sciences & Humanities
Open, Volume 13, June 2026, 102658.
14. Zhu, Y., Liu, J., Lin, S., Liang, K. Research Institution Engagement and Innovative Behavior of Scientific
Workers in China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 7 (2022) 100206.
15. Cappellano, F., Matti, K., Vidmar, M. Building Anticipatory Capacity for Transformative Resilience:
Lessons from UK and EU Applying Strategic Foresight in Grand Societal Challenge-Oriented Regional Policy.
Technology in Society, 6 July 2026, 103453.
16. Fetschenko, V., Shadoba, E., Katkow, Y., Shchelikova, N., Glushak, N. Management of Innovative
Integrated Structures of Education, Business and Science at the Regional Level. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences 214 (2015) 243-251.
17. Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., Krugman, P., Moreno, C. Old wisdom and the New Economic Geography:
Managing uncertainty in 21st century regional and urban development. Research Program Learning and
Innovation for Resilience and Sustainability (LIRS). 10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100124.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
