XORIJIY MAMLAKATLARNI SANOATLASHUV MODELLARINING QIYOSIY TAHLILI VA ULARDAN FOYDALANISH IMKONIYATLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22209603Abstract
Mazkur maqolada xorijiy mamlakatlarda milliy iqtisodiyotning sanoatlashuv jarayonini
ta’minlashga xizmat qilgan asosiy modellar qiyosiy jihatdan tadqiq etilgan. Sanoatlashtirishning klassik,
eksportga yo‘naltirilgan, davlat-investitsion, innovatsion-texnologik va aralash modellari shakllanishining
nazariy hamda institutsional asoslari ochib berilgan. AQSH, Germaniya, Yaponiya, Janubiy Koreya,
Tayvan va Xitoy tajribasi asosida sanoat siyosatining davlat va bozor mexanizmlari uyg‘unligi, texnologik
modernizatsiya, inson kapitalini rivojlantirish, eksport salohiyatini kengaytirish, milliy ishlab chiqaruvchilarni
qo‘llab-quvvatlash, global qiymat zanjirlariga integratsiyalashuv va innovatsion faoliyatni rag‘batlantirishning
iqtisodiy samaradorligi tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqot natijasida xorijiy modellarni O‘zbekiston iqtisodiyotiga to‘liq
ko‘chirish emas, balki milliy ishlab chiqarish salohiyati, resurslar, mehnat bozori, institutsional imkoniyatlar va
ichki bozor hajmiga mos ravishda selektiv adaptatsiya qilish zarurligi asoslangan. Shuningdek, O‘zbekiston
sharoitida eksportga yo‘naltirilgan, texnologik yangilanishga asoslangan va hududiy sanoat klasterlari bilan
uyg‘unlashgan gibrid sanoatlashtirish modelini shakllantirish bo‘yicha ilmiy-amaliy takliflar ishlab chiqilgan
Keywords
sanoatlashtirish, sanoat siyosati, industrializatsiya modeli, tarkibiy transformatsiya, texnologik modernizatsiya, eksport, innovatsiya, inson kapitali, sanoat klasterlari, global qiymat zanjiri, investitsiya, iqtisodiy o‘sishReferences
1. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
2. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray.
3. Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School,
22(2), 139–191.
4. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University
Press.
5. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
6. Balassa, B. (1970). Industrial policies in Taiwan and Korea (World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 86).
World Bank.
7. World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. World Bank.
8. UNIDO. (2013). Industrial development report 2013: Sustaining employment growth – The role of
manufacturing and structural change. UNIDO.
9. UNIDO. (2015). Industrial development report 2016: The role of technology and innovation in inclusive and
sustainable industrial development. UNIDO.
10. UNIDO. (2019). Industrial development report 2020: Industrializing in the digital age. UNIDO.
11. UNIDO. (2023). Industrial development report 2024: Turning challenges into sustainable solutions – The
new era of industrial policy. UNIDO.
12. UNIDO. (2026). Industrial development report 2026: Looking at the future of industrialization. UNIDO.
13. OECD. (2022). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Germany 2022. OECD Publishing.
14. Cherif, R., & Hasanov, F. (2025). Industrial policy, Asian miracle style. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
39(4), 101–126.
15. World Bank. (2026). Industrial policy for development. World Bank.
16. World Bank. (2026). The right way to do industrial policy. World Bank.
17. Industrial Management & Data Systems. (2018). A comparative study on industrial spillover effects among
Korea, China, the USA, Germany and Japan. Industrial Management & Data Systems
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
