O‘ZBEKISTONDA EKOLOGIK XAVFSIZLIKNI TA’MINLASHDA PARLAMENT NAZORATINING NATIJADORLIGI: INSTITUTSIONAL MEZONLAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22676250Abstract
Mazkur tezisda O‘zbekistonda ekologik xavfsizlikni ta’minlash jarayonida parlament
nazoratining institutsional imkoniyatlari va natijadorlik mezonlari tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning asosiy gipotezasiga
ko‘ra, nazorat samaradorligi uning shakllari yoki tadbirlari soni bilan emas, balki mustaqil axborotdan foydalanish,
aniq vazifa va indikatorlarni belgilash, ijroni izchil kuzatish hamda qarorlarni o‘lchanadigan ekologik natijaga
aylantirish qobiliyati bilan belgilanadi. 2025-yildagi suv resurslari bo‘yicha parlament so‘rovi asosida natijaviy
ekologik parlament nazoratining olti bosqichli modeli taklif etiladi.
Keywords
ekologik xavfsizlik, parlament nazorati, siyosiy hisobdorlik, ekologik boshqaruv, postlegislativ nazorat, ekologik indikator.References
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi: 2023-yil 30-aprelda o‘tkazilgan O‘zbekiston Respublikasi
referendumida umumxalq ovoz berish orqali qabul qilingan // Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi. URL:
https://lex.uz/docs/6445145 (murojaat sanasi: 21.07.2026).
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Parlament nazorati to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni, 2016-yil 11-aprel, O‘RQ-403-son
// Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/2929477 (murojaat sanasi: 21.07.2026).
3. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisi Qonunchilik palatasining suv resurslaridan samarali foydalanish
masalalariga oid 2025-yil 9-sentabrdagi 1272–V-son va 2025-yil 23-sentabrdagi 1327–V-son qarorlari // O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisi palatalarining Axborotnomasi. — 2025. — 9-son (1594). — B.
41–42, 69–70. URL: https://parliament.gov.uz/media/post_attachments/9_2025.pdf (murojaat sanasi:
21.07.2026).
4. March J. G., Olsen J. P. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life // American
Political Science Review. — 1984. — Vol. 78, No. 3. — P. 734–749. DOI: 10.2307/1961840. URL: https://
doi.org/10.2307/1961840 (murojaat sanasi: 21.07.2026).
5. Bovens M. Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework // European Law Journal.
— 2007. — Vol. 13, No. 4. — P. 447–468. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x. URL: https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x (murojaat sanasi: 21.07.2026).
6. De Vrieze F., Norton P. The Significance of Post-Legislative Scrutiny // The Journal of Legislative Studies.
— 2020. — Vol. 26, No. 3. — P. 349–361. DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2020.1780008. URL: https://doi.org/10
.1080/13572334.2020.1780008 (murojaat sanasi: 21.07.2026).
7. Hirst D. Post-Legislative Scrutiny of Climate and Environment Legislation: Guide for Parliamentary
Practice. — London: Westminster Foundation for Democracy, 2021. — 41 p. URL: https://www.wfd.org/
what-we-do/resources/post-legislative-scrutiny-climate-and-environment-legislation-guide (murojaat
sanasi: 21.07.2026).
8. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Environmental Performance Reviews: Uzbekistan.
Fourth Review. — Geneva: United Nations, 2026. — Environmental Performance Reviews Series. — ECE/
CEP/204. URL: https://unece.org/environment-policy/publications/4th-environmental-performance-reviewuzbekistan
(murojaat sanasi: 21.07.2026).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
