SUDLARNI MOLIYAVIY JIHATDAN BOSHQARISHNING XUSUSIYATLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23039461Abstract
Mazkur maqolada sudlarni moliyaviy jihatdan boshqarishning tashkiliy-iqtisodiy va huquqiy xususiyatlari tadqiq etilgan. Sud hokimiyatining mustaqilligi nafaqat protsessual va tashkiliy mustaqillikni, balki uning yetarli va barqaror moliyaviy resurslar bilan ta’minlanishini ham taqozo etadi. Maqolada sudlarni moliyalashtirishning budjetliligi, moliyaviy mustaqillik, mablag‘larni maqsadli rejalashtirish, shaffoflik, yetarlilik, xarajatlar samaradorligi va moliyaviy nazorat kabi asosiy tamoyillari tizimlashtirilgan. Shuningdek, sudlarning budjet so‘rovini shakllantirish, budjet mablag‘larini taqsimlash va tasarruf etish, moddiy-texnik ta’minot, sudyalar va sud apparati xodimlarining mehnatiga haq to‘lash, raqamli infratuzilmani moliyalashtirish hamda moliyaviy samaradorlikni baholash bo‘yicha takliflar ishlab chiqilgan.Keywords
sud hokimiyati, moliyaviy boshqaruv, sudlarni moliyalashtirish, davlat budjeti, budjet so‘rovi, moliyaviy mustaqillik, budjet samaradorligi, sud xarajatlari, raqamlashtirish.References
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2021-yil 13-yanvardagi “Sud organlari faoliyatini moliyalashtirish tizimini tubdan takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-6134-son Farmoni // URL: https://www. lex.uz/uz/docs/-5215806
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 2026-yil 11-sentyabrdagi “Sud hokimiyati organlari faoliyatini moliyalashtirish to‘g‘risida”gi O‘RQ–1177-son Qonuni // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/8472517
3. World Bank. World Development Report: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank.
4. Viapiana, F. (2018). Pressure on Judges: How the Budgeting System Can Impact on Judge’s Autonomy.
Laws, 7(4), 38.
5. Viapiana, F. (2019). Funding the Judiciary: How Budgeting System Shapes Justice. A Comparative Analysis of Three Case Studies. International Journal for Court Administration, 10(1), 23–33.
6. Viapiana, F. (2020). A performance-based budget in the judiciary: allocation of resources and performance variability in first instance courts. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(2), 177–206.
7. OECD. Government at a Glance. OECD Publishing. 8. Bosio, E. (2025). A Survey of Judicial Effectiveness: The Last Quarter Century of Empirical Evidence.
World Bank Research Observer, 40(2), 185–210.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
