IMPROVING LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS FOR REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH GREEN INVESTMENT IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23391130

Abstract

The relevance of this study stems from the need to coordinate green finance flows with regional industrial policy: when legal requirements, incentives, and monitoring mechanisms operate separately, investment cannot generate its full industrial effect. The aim is to assess how green investment contributes to regional industrial development in Uzbekistan and to identify ways to strengthen legalinstitutional coherence. The methodology combines Difference-in-Differences estimation, region and time fixed-effects modeling, Location Quotient analysis, panel-data regression, instrumental-variable testing of endogeneity, GMM estimation, and robustness checks. The estimates show a positive relationship between green investment and regional industrial development. The green-investment coefficient is β = 0.227, with a standard error of 0.052, a t-statistic of 4.37, and p < 0.001. The regional industrialdevelopment indicator records β = 0.184, a standard error of 0.041, a t-statistic of 4.49, and p < 0.001. Institutional coherence has β = 0.163, a standard error of 0.047, a t-statistic of 3.47, and p = 0.001; additional specifications produce p = 0.009 and p = 0.018. The study’s scientific contribution is a unified regional assessment framework connecting green investment, industrial dynamics, and institutional coherence. The findings support coordinated use of mandatory environmental criteria, territorial investment incentives, and regular monitoring. This arrangement links economic efficiency with durable regional industrial transformation and offers a practical basis for evaluating regional policy instruments. Future applications should compare incentive designs across regions while preserving consistent environmental and institutional benchmarks.

Keywords

Difference-in-Differences estimation, green capital flows, industrial modernization, institutional coherence, legal regulation, sustainable financing, Uzbekistan

References

United Nations Environment Programme. Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. - Nairobi: UNEP, 2011. - 631 p. - URL: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/greeneconomy-pathways-sustainable-development-and-poverty-eradication (accessed: 06.10.2026).

World Bank. Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development. – Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012. – 192 p. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6.

OECD. Green Growth Indicators 2021. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021. – 164 p. – DOI: https://doi. org/10.1787/3eeda7af-en.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Industrial Development Report 2022: The Future of Industrialization in a Post-Pandemic World. – Vienna: UNIDO, 2021. – 220 p. – URL: https://www.unido. org/resources-publications-flagship-publications-industrial-development-report-series/idr2022 (accessed: 06.10.2026).

Republic of Uzbekistan. On approval of the Strategy for the transition of the Republic of Uzbekistan to a “green” economy for the period 2019–2030. – Tashkent: National Database of Legislation, 2019. - URL: https:// lex.uz/docs/4539506 (accessed: 06.10.2026).

Republic of Uzbekistan. Strategy of Actions on Five Priority Development Areas of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2017–2021. - Tashkent: National Database of Legislation, 2017. – URL: https://lex.uz/ docs/3107036 (accessed: 06.10.2026).

Ministry of Economy and Finance of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan Country Climate and Development Report. - Tashkent: Ministry of Economy and Finance, 2023. - URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/ country/uzbekistan/publication/uzbekistan-country-climate-and-development-report (accessed: 06.10.2026).

Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016

International Energy Agency. World Energy Investment 2024. – Paris: IEA, 2024. – 224 p. – URL: https:// www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024 (accessed: 06.10.2026).

Porter, M. E. (1995). van der Linde C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

Eyraud, L., Wane, A., Zhang, C., & Clements, B. (2011). Who’s Going Green and Why? Trends and Determinants of Green Investment. IMF Working Paper, 11(93), 1–35.

D’Amato, D., & Toppinen, A. (2015). The Role of Business Models in Creating Value from Ecosystem Services in Private Enterprises. Ecosystem Services, 12, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j

Barbier, E. B. (2011). The Policy Challenges for Green Economy and Sustainable Economic Development. Natural Resources Forum, 35(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01397.x

Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J., & Rozenberg, J. (2019). Adaptation Principles: A Guide for Designing Strategies for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Joʻrayeva, M. Z. qizi. (2026). IMPROVING LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS FOR REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH GREEN INVESTMENT IN UZBEKISTAN. GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT, 4(10), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23391130
Vol. 4 No. 10 (2026): «Yashil iqtisodiyot va taraqqiyot» jurnali 10-son