THE ROLE OF NATIONAL HERITAGE ASSETS IN SHAPING UZBEKISTAN’S TOURISM IMAGE: SPATIAL CONCENTRATION, CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS AND CROSS-NATIONAL BENCHMARKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23592769Abstract
This article examines the regional distribution of cultural heritage assets in Uzbekistan and the concentration of international tourist flows across the country. The Herfindahl–Hirschman Index and the Gini coefficient are used to measure disparities between the distribution of heritage assets and visitor flows. Regression models are applied to investigate the relationships between the number of cultural heritage assets, accommodation capacity and tourist arrivals. The study also benchmarks Uzbekistan against other countries to assess international arrivals in relation to the number of UNESCO World Heritage properties. The findings indicate that tourist flows are substantially more concentrated geographically than cultural heritage assets and that accommodation infrastructure is an important factor associated with visitor distribution. Based on these findings, the article proposes measures to expand accommodation capacity in heritage-rich regions, systematically monitor regional tourism indicators and integrate tourist itineraries to support a more balanced distribution of tourism activity and benefits across Uzbekistan.Keywords
cultural heritage, regional tourism, international tourist flows, accommodation infrastructure, regression analysis, regional disparities, World Heritage properties, tourism policyReferences
Baloglu, S. and McCleary, K.W. (1999) A model of destination image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(4), 868-897. DOI:10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4
Echtner, C.M. and Ritchie, J.R.B. (1993) The measurement of destination image: an empirical assessment. Journal of Travel Research, 31(4), 3-13. DOI: 10.1177/004728759303100402
Fakeye, P.C. and Crompton, J.L. (1991) Image differences between prospective, first-time, and repeat visitors to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Journal of Travel Research, 30(2), 10-16. DOI:10.1177/004728759103000202
Formica, S. and Uysal, M. (2006) Destination attractiveness based on supply and demand evaluations: an analytical framework. Journal of Travel Research, 44(4), 418-430. DOI:10.1177/0047287506286714
Gartner, W.C. (1993) Image formation process. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 2(2-3), 191-216. DOI:10.1300/J073v02n02_12
Gunn, C.A. (1972) Vacationscape: Designing Tourist Regions. Austin: Bureau of Business Research, University of Texas.
ICOMOS (2008) The ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. Quebec: ICOMOS.
Richards, G. (2011) Creativity and tourism: the state of the art. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1225-1253. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.07.008
UNESCO (1972) Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2003) Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO.
World Bank. World Development Indicators. Series ST.INT.ARVL, ST.INT.RCPT.CD, SP.POP.TOTL.
National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Tourism statistics, regional tables.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


