The role of small business enterprises in enhancing the well-being of the population in Uzbekistan

The role of small business enterprises in enhancing the well-being of the population in Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Djalilova Shaxlo Ismoiljon kizi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17149312

Keywords:

small business enterprises (SBEs), well-being, economic development, job creation, income generation, poverty reduction, microfinance, government support, entrepreneurship training, digital technologies

Abstract

This study explores the crucial function of small business enterprises (SBEs) in enhancing the well-being of the
population in Uzbekistan. It analyzes the diverse contributions of SBEs, such as generating jobs, increasing income, and
their effects on local economic growth, while also recognizing the obstacles they encounter. The research utilizes a mixedmethods
framework, combining quantitative analysis of statistical information of Uzbekistan regarding SBE performance
metrics (e.g., revenue, employment, access to finance) with qualitative insights drawn from semi-structured interviews
with 50 SBE owners from various sectors. The analysis investigates how factors like access to microfinance, government
assistance programs, entrepreneurship training initiatives, and the implementation of digital technologies influence SBE
expansion and its resulting effect on poverty alleviation, improved living standards, and overall societal welfare. The
anticipated findings aim to offer meaningful recommendations for policymakers striving to establish a more favorable
environment for SBEs, ultimately aiding in sustainable economic growth and enhanced quality of life for Uzbekistan's
citizens.

Author Biography

Djalilova Shaxlo Ismoiljon kizi


Andijan State Technical Institute
Department of “Economics” PhD student

References

1. Islam, Iyanatul (2002). Poverty, Employment and Wages: An Indonesian Perspective, in Labour Market Policies and

Poverty Reduction Strategies in Recovery from the Asian Crisis. Report of a seminar held in Jakarta, 29 April – 1 May

2002. ILO, Bangkok.

2. Ayyagari, Meghana., T. Beck., and M. Hoseini (2013). Finance and Poverty: Evidence from India, CEPR Discussion

Paper No. 9497, June 2013, Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ, UK.

3. Banerjee, A. and A. F. Newman,(1993). “Occupational Choice and the Process of Development”, Journal of Political

Economy 101, 274-298.

4. Wong, P.K., Y.P. Ho, and E. Autio (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM

data. Small Business Economics 24: 335–50

5. Schumpeter, J. A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Row

6. Valliere, D., and Peterson, R.(2009). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: Evidence from emerging and developed

countries. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(5-6), 459-480.

7. van Stel, A., M. Carree, and R. Thurik. 2004. The effect of entrepreneurship on national economic growth: An analysis

using the GEM database. Discussion papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy, No. 3404. Jena: Max

Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems

8. Wennekers, S. and R. Thurik, 1999, ‘Linking Entrepre- neurship and Economic Growth’, Small Business Economics

13(1), 27-55.

9. https://www.gazeta.uz/oz/2020/01/24/president-speech/.

10. https://www.worldbank.org.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01
Loading...