SUN’IY INTELLEKT ASOSIDAGI INVESTITSIYALARNI JALB QILISH TAHLILI: SINGAPUR IQTISODIY TARAQQIYOT KENGASHI, IRLANDIYANING IDA STRATEGIYASI VA BAANING NEXTGENFDI TASHABBUSI TAQQOSLAMASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17480738Keywords:
sun’iy intellekt asosidagi investitsiyalarni rag‘batlantirish, institutsional taqqoslama tahlil, regressiya–AHP gibrid modeli, raqamli ishtirok metrikalari, platforma boshqaruvi va shaffoflik, institutsional tayyorgarlikni baholash, algoritmik qarorlarni qo‘llab-quvvatlash tizimlariAbstract
boyitilgan qarorlarni qo‘llab-quvvatlash tizimlaridan foydalanish, maqsadli investorlar bilan samarali
muloqotni yo‘lga qo‘yish va shu bilan birga muayyan rivojlanish strategiyasi uchun rag‘batlantiruvchi omillar uyg‘unligini
ta’minlash orqali raqobat ustunligini oshirish imkonini beradi. Xalqaro miqyosdagi ushbu jarayon sababli, ma’lum bir
institutsional kontekstda investitsiyalarni targ‘ib qilish agentliklarining samaradorligini baholash zarur va muhim
hisoblanadi. Sun’iy intellekt davrida investitsiyalarni qo‘llab-quvvatlash strategiyalarini chuqurroq tushunish maqsadida,
biz avvalo investorlarga oid xatti-harakatlar va institutsional tayyorgarlikni real vaqt rejimidagi ma’lumotlar asosida
regressiya–AHP gibrid modeli yordamida miqdoriy tahlil qilamiz. Tadqiqot milliy miqyosdagi sun’iy intellekt asosidagi
investitsiya rag‘batlantirish tizimlariga qaratilgan bo‘lib, investitsiya kampaniyalarining loyihalanishi, moslashuvchanligi
va samaradorligini taqqoslama yondashuv asosida platforma tahlillari yordamida baholash mumkinligini ko‘rsatadi. Gibrid
baholashning asosiy natijaviy ko‘rsatkichlari sifatida quyidagi mezonlar ishlatilgan: raqamli ishtirok indeksi uchun og‘irlik
koeffitsienti, platforma shaffofligi bahosi, hamda to‘rtta strategik qaror mezoni — javob beruvchanlik, shaxsiylashtirish,
kengayuvchanlik va boshqaruv — ustuvorligi. Milliy tashabbuslar kontekstida ushbu o‘zgaruvchilar bo‘yicha ko‘p martalik
regressiya tahlili orqali investitsiyalarni jalb etish nuqtayi nazaridan mavjud konseptual modellarning kuchli va zaif
tomonlari tahlil qilindi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatdiki, siyosat modellarining uch turi mavjud: to‘liq integrallashgan yoki qisman/
raqamli qo‘shimcha model (Singapur), merosiy cheklovlarsiz raqamli-tug‘ma model (BAA) va maqsadli yo‘naltirilgan
model (Irlandiya). Taklif etilgan model samaradorlikdagi farqlarning 84 foizigacha izohlab bera oldi; raqamli strategiya
o‘zgaruvchilari 41–62% oralig‘ida, institutsional tayyorgarlik o‘zgaruvchilari 33–55% oralig‘ida, va investorlarning
javob beruvchanlik o‘zgaruvchilari 29–48% oralig‘ida tushuntirish kuchiga ega bo‘ldi. Ushbu natijalar siyosatchilar va
institutsional dizaynerlar uchun muhim amaliy xulosalar berishi mumkin. Kelajakdagi investitsiyalarni rag‘batlantirish
manzarasi intellektual tahlilga asoslangan paradigma tomon siljiydi va global kapital oqimlarini boshqarishda sun’iy
intellektni joriy etishning imkoniyatlari hamda muammolarini ochib beradi
References
1. Papyshev, G. (2023). The state’s role in governing artificial intelligence: Development, control, and promotion through
national strategies. Policy Design and Practice.
2. Goode, K., et al. (2023). Examining Singapore’s AI progress. [Journal Name if known].
3. Edirisinghe, H. (2021). Strategic unification of artificial intelligence in foreign direct investment application forms.
Sustainable Development Research.
4. Habbal, F., et al. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence to empower public services for talent attraction: A comparative
analysis for the UAE. Emirati Journal of Business, Economics, & Social Studies.
5. Ozkaya, G. (2023). Analysis of countries in terms of artificial intelligence technologies: PROMETHEE and GAIA
method approach. Sustainability.
6. Mubarok, M. U., et al. (2024). Comparative study of artificial intelligence (AI) utilization in digital marketing strategies
between developed and developing countries: A systematic literature review. Ilomata International Journal of
Management.
7. Rane, N., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence enhanced environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategies for
financial services and investment sectors. Social Science Research Network.
8. Csaszar, F. A., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and strategic decision-making: Evidence from entrepreneurs and
investors. Strategy Science.
9. Almansoori, S. S. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in the decision-making process at the Ministry of Interior in
the United Arab Emirates. Journal of AlMaarif University College.
10. Fenwick, M., et al. (2024). Business and regulatory responses to artificial intelligence: Dynamic regulation, innovation
ecosystems and the strategic management of disruptive technology. arXiv.
11. Al-Qudah, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence in practice: Implications for information systems research, case study UAE
companies. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Finance and Sustainable Technology.
12. Shamout, F. E. (2021). The strategic pursuit of artificial intelligence in the United Arab Emirates. Communications of
the ACM.
13. Guo, H. (2025). Comparative review of AI applications in urban transport: Insights from China’s City Brain and
Singapore’s LTA Smart Mobility. Journal of Innovation and Technology.
14. Rajagopal, N. K., et al. (2022). Future of business culture: An artificial intelligence-driven digital framework for
organization decision-making process. Complex.
15. Florido-Benítez, L. (2024). How artificial intelligence (AI) is powering new tourism marketing and the future agenda for
smart tourist destinations. Electronics.
16. Khanal, S., et al. (2024). Development of new generation of artificial intelligence in China: When Beijing’s global
ambitions meet local realities. Journal of Contemporary China.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 YASHIL IQTISODIYOT VA TARAQQIYOT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.