XALQARO LOYIHALARNI BOSHQARISHDA RAQAMLI INTEGRATSIYA YETUKLIGI MODELI VA SAMARADORLIKNI BAHOLASH METODOLOGIYASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18649655Keywords:
xalqaro loyiha boshqaruvi, raqamli integratsiya, yetuklik modeli, samaradorlikni baholash, raqamli transformatsiya, ko‘p mezonli tahlil, loyiha risklarini boshqarish, integrallashgan boshqaruv indeksiAbstract
Mazkur maqolada xalqaro loyihalarni boshqarish jarayonida raqamli integratsiya yetukligi modelini ishlab
chiqish hamda uning samaradorligini baholash metodologiyasi taklif etiladi. Tadqiqot global loyiha muhitida raqamli
platformalar, bulutli texnologiyalar va ma’lumotlar almashinuvi tizimlarining o‘zaro integratsiyalashuv darajasi loyiha
natijalariga qanday ta’sir ko‘rsatishini aniqlashga qaratilgan. Nazariy asos sifatida loyiha boshqaruvi standartlari, xususan,
Project Management Institute metodologiyasi hamda International Project Management Association kompetensiya modeli
tahlil qilinadi.
Tadqiqotda tizimli yondashuv, ko‘p mezonli baholash, ekspert so‘rovlari va regressiya tahlili usullaridan foydalaniladi.
Raqamli integratsiya yetukligi besh bosqichli model asosida aniqlanib, texnologik infratuzilma, ma’lumotlar interoperabelligi,
kiberxavfsizlik, boshqaruv shaffofligi hamda manfaatdor tomonlar o‘rtasidagi hamkorlik ko‘rsatkichlari orqali o‘lchanadi.
Samaradorlikni baholash metodologiyasi loyiha muddati, xarajat samaradorligi, risklarni kamaytirish darajasi va
innovatsion natijalar bilan bog‘liq integral indeksni shakllantirishni nazarda tutadi.
Natijada taklif etilgan model xalqaro loyihalarda raqamli transformatsiya darajasini aniqlash, boshqaruv qarorlarini
optimallashtirish hamda barqaror rivojlanish ko‘rsatkichlarini oshirishga xizmat qiladi. Tadqiqot global loyiha boshqaruvi
tizimini takomillashtirish uchun metodologik asos yaratad
References
1. Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th
ed.). Project Management Institute.
2. International Project Management Association. (2015). Individual competence baseline for project, programme &
portfolio management (ICB4). International Project Management Association.
3. Kerzner H. (2022). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (13th ed.). John
Wiley & Sons.
4. Too E.G. & Weaver P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for governance.
International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006
5. Vial G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information
Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
6. Bharadwaj A., El Sawy O.A., Pavlou P.A. & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation
of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
7. Matt C., Hess T. & Benlian A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering,
57(5), 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
8. Schwalbe K. (2021). Information technology project management (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
9. Westerman G., Bonnet D. & McAfee A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation.
Harvard Business Review Press.
10. Pinto J.K. (2020). Project management: Achieving competitive advantage (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
11. Serrador P. & Pinto J.K. (2015). Does Agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal
of Project Management, 33(5), 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006
12. OECD. (2020). The digital transformation of public governance. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.