DAVLAT FUQAROLIK XIZMATI IMIJINI OSHIRISHDAGI MUAMMOLARNI HAL ETISHDA XORIJIY DAVLATLAR TAJRIBASI: QIYOSIY TAHLIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18986590Keywords:
davlat fuqarolik xizmati, imij, jozibadorlik, jamoatchilik ishonchi, strategik rejalashtirish, inson resurslarini boshqarish, kompetensiya, motivatsiya, raqamli HRM, korrupsiyaga qarshi kurash, inklyuzivlik, xorijiy tajribaAbstract
Mazkur maqolada Yangi O‘zbekiston sharoitida davlat fuqarolik xizmati imijini oshirishdagi dolzarb
muammolarni hal etish maqsadida xorijiy davlatlar tajribasi qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda davlat xizmati imiji jamoatchilik
ishonchi, ma’muriy legitimlik va boshqaruv samaradorligi bilan uzviy bog‘liq ekani ilmiy jihatdan asoslanadi. Avstraliya,
Isroil, Fransiya, Singapur, Germaniya, Yaponiya va Janubiy Koreya tajribasi asosida strategik rejalashtirish, inson
resurslarini boshqarish, raqamli boshqaruv tizimlari, institutsional halollik va kadrlar salohiyatini rivojlantirish davlat xizmati
nufuzini mustahkamlashda muhim omil ekani ko‘rsatilgan. Shuningdek, davlat xizmatida motivatsiya, rag‘batlantirish va
kompetensiyalarni rivojlantirish mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish bo‘yicha amaliy xulosalar berilgan.
References
1. Browne J.P. and Golembiewski R.T. (1974). The line-staff concept revisited: an empirical study of organizational
images. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, – pp. 407–417; Hatch, Mary Jo, & Schultz, Majken (1997).
Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31, No. 5/6, – pp.
356–365; Wilson, Alan (2001). Corporate reputation: Seeking a definition. Corporate Communications: An International
Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, – pp. 24–25.
2. Eran Vigoda. Bright Shining Stars: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Image on the Relationship Between
Work Variables and Army Officers’ Intentions to Leave the Service for a Job in High-Tech Industry. Public Personnel
Management, Vol. 33, no. 2 (Summer 2004), 201–223, – S. 202.
3. Maria Schuler. Management of the Organizational Image: Organizational Image Configuration. Corporate Reputation
Review, Vol. 7, no. 1 (Spring 2004), 37–53, – S. 38.
4. Dean Kazoleas. Institutional Image: A Case Study Corporate Communications. International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4
(2001), 205–216, – S. 206.
5. Егорова, Н. С. Имидж государственных гражданских служащих региона / Н. С. Егорова. – 2020. – № 10 (300).
– С. 209–210.
6. Gaston LeBlanc. Image and reputation of higher education institutions in Students Retention Decisions. The
International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 15, no. 6 (2001), 303–311, – S. 303.
7. Maria Schuler. Management of the Organizational Image: Organizational Image Configuration. Corporate Reputation
Review, Vol. 7, no. 1 (Spring 2004), 37–53, – S. 38.
8. Zeyyat Sabuncuoğlu. Halkla İlişkiler, İstanbul: Aktüel Yayıncılık, 2004, – S. 91.
9. Сергеева Т.А., Савченко И.А. Проблема имиджа государственных служащих в России // Вестник ГУУ. 2020. №
5. – С. 111–135.
10. https://lex.uz/docs/7587464
11. Brezzi E., Phillips E., & Prats M. (OECD). Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions in Australia. OECD, 2025.
12. Martin Kitchener & Rachel Ashworth (24 Jul 2025): Strategizing public value, Public Management Review, DOI:
10.1080/14719037.2025.2538067
13. Davidov P. (2024). Motivation of public sector employees in Israel depending on their status and education level.
Administratie si Management Public, 42, 131-144. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2024.42-08
14. OCDE. Emploi et gestion publics 2021: L’avenir de la fonction publique. – Paris : Éditions OCDE, 2022. – P. 131-135.
15. Guenduez A.A., Demircioglu M.A., Mueller E.M., Cinar E. Digital innovation strategies in the public sector // Research
Policy. – 2025. – Vol. 54, No. 8. – Article 105274. – DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274.
16. Муаллиф ишланмаси (Bundeskriminalamt (2023). Korruptionsprävention in der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Praxis,
Mechanismen und Herausforderungen. Vienna: BKA Press. PDF available at: https://netlibrary.aau.at/obvuklhs/
download/pdf/2410280 маълумотлари асосида).
17. https://lex.uz/docs/6445145
18. World Economic Forum. (2025). Global Gender Gap Report 2025. World Economic Forum. Available at: https://reports.
weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2025.pdf
19. Wrohlich, K., Zucco, A., & Hennig, J. (2021). Gender quotas and the representation of women in leadership positions
in Germany. German Economic Review, 22 (2), 131–158.
20. Paterson, S., & Scala, F. (2017). Gender mainstreaming and the discursive politics of public service values.
Administrative Theory & Praxis, 39(1), 1–18. https: // doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2016.1273726
21. Tan K.P. (2008). Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideology and practice in Singapore. International Political
Science Review, 29(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107083448
22. Kan M. E. Yolsuzlukla mücadelede örnek bir ülke olarak Singapur: Siyasi irade, yasalar, reformlar, eğitim ve işbirliği //
Fiscaoeconomia. – 2025. – Vol. 9. – No. 4. – P. 1873–1892. – DOI: 10.25295/fsecon.1640206.
23. https://www.mpm.go.kr/english/system/eSaram/
24. e-Saram платформаси ва интернет манбалари асосида муаллиф томонидан тайёрланди.
25. Хожиев Э.Т., Исмаилова Г.С., Рахимова М.А. Давлат хизмати: ўқув қўлланма. – Тошкент: Baktria press, 2015.
– Б. 109.
26. Eymeri-Douzans J.M. (2001), La fabrique des énarques. – Paris: Economica, «Études politiques». – Pp. 796-799.
27. Zulkarnain Z.P., Prasojo E. Understanding Japan’s Civil Service System: Norms, Meritocracy, and Institutional Change
// Policy & Governance Review. – 2021. – Vol. 5, Issue 1. – P. 1–17. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v5i1.355.
28. Муаллиф ишланмаси (интернет манбалари асосида тайёрланди).
29. Koichiro Agata, Hiroaki Inatsugu, Hideaki Shiroyama. The Management of Human Resources in Japan’s Public
Service // Public Administration in Japan. – Cham: Springer, 2024. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58610-1
30. Lim J.Y., Moon K.K. The Public Service Motivation’s Impact on Turnover Intention in Korean Public Organizations:
Do Perceived Organizational Politics Matter? // Behavioral Sciences. – 2025. – Vol. 15 (4), 474. – DOI: https://doi.
org/10.3390/bs15040474.
31. Perry J.L., Wise L.R. The Motivational Bases of Public Service // Public Administration Review. – 1990. – Vol. 50, No.
3. – P. 367–373. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976618.
32. Anderfuhren-Biget S., Varone F., Giauque D., Ritz A. Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service
Motivation Matter? // International Public Management Journal. – 2010. – Vol. 13, No. 3. – P. 213–246; Petrovsky N.,
Ritz A. Public Service Motivation and Performance: A Critical Perspective // Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for
Empirical Scholarship. – 2014. – Vol. 2, No. 1. – P. 57–79; Palma R., Crisci A., Mangia G. Public Service Motivation–
Individual Performance Relationship: Does User Orientation Matter? // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. –
2020. – Vol. 73; Lim J.Y., Moon K.K. The Public Service Motivation’s Impact on Turnover Intention in Korean Public
Organizations: Do Perceived Organizational Politics Matter? // Behavioral Sciences. – 2025. – Vol. 15 (4), 474.
33. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development and
Well-Being // American Psychologist. – 2000. – Vol. 55, No. 1. – P. 68–78.
34. Anderfuhren-Biget S., Varone F., Giauque D., Ritz A. Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service
Motivation Matter? // International Public Management Journal. – 2010. – Vol. 13, No. 3. – P. 213–246.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.