THE ADDITIONALITY GAP: EVALUATING THE SYNERGY BETWEEN GREEN FINANCE AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES

THE ADDITIONALITY GAP: EVALUATING THE SYNERGY BETWEEN GREEN FINANCE AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES

Authors

  • Ataxanov Umidbek Olimovich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19239272

Keywords:

Green Finance, Greenium, RCK Model, Additionality, Uzbekistan, Agrobank.

Abstract

This article examines the structural efficiency and "additionality" of green finance instruments in emerging
economies. Utilizing a triangulated case-study design, the research analyzes primary data from the 2024–2026 issuance
cycles of Uzbekistan (Agrobank), India, and Brazil. By adapting the Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans (RCK) growth model and
applying the Matching Bond Method, the study quantifies the "Financial Greenium" (γ) and its impact on the marginal
product of green capital (k_g). Results indicate a significant greenium of 5.2–6.0 bps in mature markets like India, whereas
Uzbekistan exhibits a 62.45% refinancing rate, highlighting a persistent additionality gap. The findings suggest that while
green bonds effectively mobilize capital, long-term macroeconomic growth requires a strategic shift toward Greenfield
project financing and standardized transparency frameworks to stabilize the sustainability multiplier (σ).

Author Biography

Ataxanov Umidbek Olimovich

Namangan State University
Faculty of Economics,
Doctoral Student at the Department of Financial Relations

References

1. Federative Republic of Brazil. Sovereign Sustainable Bond Report 2024–2025. – Brasília: National Treasury Secretariat,

2025.

2. World Bank. Sovereign Green Bond Issuance Guide for Emerging Markets. – Washington D.C.: World Bank

Publications, 2024.

3. Ministry of Finance of India. Allocation and Impact Report for Sovereign Green Bonds (FY 2025-26). – New Delhi:

Government of India, 2026.

4. Agrobank JSCB. Green Bond Allocation and Impact Report 2024. – Tashkent: Agrobank, 2025.

5. Sustainable Fitch. Second-Party Opinion and Post-Issuance Review: Uzbekistan Agricultural Bonds. – London: Fitch

Ratings, 2026.

6. International Capital Market Association (ICMA). Green Bond Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines. – Paris: ICMA,

2024.

7. Ramsey F. P. A Mathematical Theory of Saving // The Economic Journal. – 1928. – Vol. 38, № 152. – P. 543–559.

8. Cass D. Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation // The Review of Economic Studies. –

1965. – Vol. 32, № 3. – P. 233–240.

9. Koopmans T. C. On the Concept of Optimal Economic Growth. – Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 1965.

10. Acemoglu D. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

11. Zerbib O. D. The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds // Journal of

Banking & Finance. – 2019. – Vol. 98. – P. 39–60.

12. European Commission. EU Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities: 2024 Technical Annex. – Brussels: EU Publishing,

2024.

13. Bahriddinov N. O‘zbekistonda yashil moliyalashtirish mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish // Yashil Iqtisodiyot va Taraqqiyot.

– 2026. – № 1. – B. 45–52.

14. Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. 2nd Edition. – Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.

15. Ehlers T., Packer F. Green bond finance: integrated or segmented? // BIS Quarterly Review. – 2024. – September

issue. – P. 89–101.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Ataxanov , U. (2026). THE ADDITIONALITY GAP: EVALUATING THE SYNERGY BETWEEN GREEN FINANCE AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES. GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19239272
Loading...