TIJORAT BANKLARIDA KREDITLARNING QAYTMASLIGI (NPL) VA LIKVIDLIK: PUL OQIMLARIDAGI UZILISHLAR TAHLILI

TIJORAT BANKLARIDA KREDITLARNING QAYTMASLIGI (NPL) VA LIKVIDLIK: PUL OQIMLARIDAGI UZILISHLAR TAHLILI

Authors

  • Samandarboy Sulaymanov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19467939

Keywords:

muammoli kreditlar (NPL), likvidlik, pul oqimlari uzilishlari, kredit riski, likvidlik riski, tijorat banklari, moliyaviy barqarorlik, kredit portfeli sifati, to‘lov qobiliyati, risklarni boshqarish

Abstract

Ushbu tadqiqot tijorat banklarida muammoli kreditlar (NPL) darajasi bilan likvidlik holati o‘rtasidagi o‘zaro
bog‘liqlikni pul oqimlaridagi uzilishlar kontekstida tahlil etadi. Tadqiqotda dinamik va tavsifiy yondashuvlar qo‘llanilib,
muammoli kreditlar ulushining o‘zgarishi banklarning foizli daromadlari, resurs bazasi barqarorligi, likvid aktivlari hajmi
hamda joriy to‘lov qobiliyatiga ta’siri baholandi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatdiki, NPL darajasining ortishi pul oqimlari kirimini
sekinlashtiradi va likvidlik bosimini kuchaytiradi, aksincha, uning kamayishi pul oqimlarining barqarorlashuviga xizmat
qiladi. Tadqiqotda kredit va likvidlik risklarini integratsiyalashgan holda boshqarish, muammoli kreditlarni erta aniqlash,
restrukturizatsiya mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish hamda likvidlik buferlarini mustahkamlash zarurligi asoslab berildi

Author Biography

Samandarboy Sulaymanov

Toshkent davlat iqtisodiyot universiteti mustaqil tadqiqotchisi

References

1. Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity. Journal of Political Economy,

91(3), 401–419.

2. Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank Liquidity Creation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779–3837.

3. Brunnermeier, M. K., & Pedersen, L. H. (2009). Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity. Review of Financial Studies,

22(6), 2201–2238.

4. Vento, G. A., & Ganga, P. L. (2009). Bank Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision. Journal of Banking Regulation,

10(1), 7–26.

5. Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and Bank-Specific Determinants of Non-

Performing Loans in Greece. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 1012–1027.

6. Espinoza, R., & Prasad, A. (2010). Nonperforming Loans in the GCC Banking System and Their Macroeconomic

Effects. IMF Working Paper.

7. Klein, N. (2013). Non-Performing Loans in CESEE: Determinants and Impact on Macroeconomic Performance. IMF

Working Paper.

8. Acharya, V. V., & Mora, N. (2015). A Crisis of Banks as Liquidity Providers. Journal of Finance, 70(1), 1–43.

9. Cornett, M. M., McNutt, J. J., Strahan, P. E., & Tehranian, H. (2011). Liquidity Risk Management and Credit Supply in

the Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 297–312.

10. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2013). Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Liquidity Risk Monitoring

Tools.

11. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2014). Basel III: The Net Stable Funding Ratio.

12. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2008). Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision.

13. www.cbu.uz O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Markaziy banki rasmiy sayti ma’lumotlari asosida muallif tomonidan shakllantirildi.

14. www.lex.uz O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Qonunchiligining rasmiy sayti ma’lumotlari

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Sulaymanov , S. (2026). TIJORAT BANKLARIDA KREDITLARNING QAYTMASLIGI (NPL) VA LIKVIDLIK: PUL OQIMLARIDAGI UZILISHLAR TAHLILI. GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19467939
Loading...