NAMANGAN VILOYATI IQTISODIYOTIDA TARKIBIY O‘ZGARISHLAR: HUDUDIY VA TARMOQ TAHLILI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19504868Keywords:
tarkibiy o‘zgarishlar, mintaqaviy iqtisodiyot, samaradorlik indeksi, tarkibiy rivojlanish indeksi, portfolio matritsasi, ixtisoslashuv koeffitsiyenti, Namangan viloyati, tarmoq tuzilmasi, SWOT tahlilAbstract
Mazkur tadqiqot Namangan viloyati iqtisodiyotining tarmoq va hududiy tuzilmasida 2018–2024-yillar
davomida ro‘y bergan tarkibiy transformatsiya jarayonlarini o‘rganishga bag‘ishlangan. Tadqiqotda portfolio matritsasi
yordamida tarmoqlarning mintaqaviy ixtisoslashuv koeffitsiyenti (LQ) aniqlangan, samaradorlik indeksi (SI) va tarkibiy
rivojlanish indeksi (TRI) metodikasi orqali har bir tarmoqning respublika miqyosidagi nisbiy samaradorligi baholangan.
Natijalar viloyatda agrar sektorning YaHMdagi ulushi 36,9 foizdan 29,3 foizga tushganini, sanoat ulushi 21,0 foizdan 23,1
foizga, savdo xizmatlari ulushi esa 13,0 foizdan 18,1 foizga o‘sganini ko‘rsatdi. Biroq TRI ko‘rsatkichining 2018-yildagi
0,643 dan 2020-yilda 0,670 gacha ko‘tarilib, 2024-yilda 0,639 gacha pasayishi viloyat iqtisodiyotida tarkibiy islohotlarning
samaradorligi bo‘yicha qo‘shimcha chora-tadbirlar zarurligini tasdiqlaydi.
References
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti Sh.M. Mirziyoyevning Oliy Majlisga Murojaatnomasi. 29.12.2020 y. URL: https://
president.uz/oz/lists/view/4057
2. Lewis W.A. Economic development with unlimited supply of labor // Journal of the Manchester school of economics
and social studies. – 1954. No. 22(2), P. 139–191.
3. Fei J.C.H., Ranis G. A theory of economic development // The American Economic Review. – 1961. No. 51(4), P.
533–565.
4. Baumol W. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis // American Economic Review. – 1967.
No. 57(3), P. 415–426.
5. Hartwig J. Productivity growth in service industries – Has Baumol‘s disease really been cured? – Zurich: KOF Working
papers 06-155, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, 2006. – 24 p.
6. Moshkov A.V. Strukturnye izmeneniya v territorial‘no-otraslevyx sistemax promyshlennosti rossiyskogo Dal‘nego
Vostoka: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra geogr. nauk. – Vladivostok, 2005. – S.8.
7. Nizamov A.A. Mintaqa iqtisodiyotini tarkibiy jihatdan takomillashtirish yo‘llari: PhD diss. avtoreferati. – T.: PMTI, 2021.
– B.12.
8. Soliyev A.S., Qurbonov Sh.B., Rajabov F.T. Sdvigi v otraslevoy i territorial‘noy strukture ekonomiki Uzbekistana //
Sotsial‘no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya. – 2016. No. 5. S. 209–218.
9. Baker P. et al. Analytical tools for enhancing the participation of developing countries in the multilateral trading system
// AUSSENWIRTSCHAFT-ZURICH. – 2002. T. 57. No. 3. P. 343–372.
10. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Davlat statistika qo‘mitasi rasmiy ma’lumotlari. URL: https://stat.uz
11. Namangan viloyati statistika boshqarmasi ma’lumotlari, https://www.namstat.uz.
12. Miller, M. M., Gibson, L. J., & Wright, N. G. (1991). Location quotient: A basic tool for economic development
analysis. Economic Development Review, 9(2), 65–68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/
S1618866724002164.
13. Petrakos, G., & Saratsis, Y. (2000). Regional inequalities in Greece. Papers in Regional Science, 79(1), 57–74. URL:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24060925_Regional_Inequalities_in_Greece
14. Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the inequality of nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
110(4), 857–880.
15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24091515_Globalization_and_the_Inequality_of_Nations.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.