GLOBAL BRANDING VS. LOCAL BRANDING: STRATEGIC TRADE-OFFS IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETING

GLOBAL BRANDING VS. LOCAL BRANDING: STRATEGIC TRADE-OFFS IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETING

Authors

  • Aziz Kurbanovich Abdullaev
  • Mamasolieva Kamila
  • Akhmedova Zaynabkhon Khayrullo qizi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20123467

Keywords:

global branding, local branding, international marketing, consumer behavior, market share, hybrid strategy, competitiveness.

Abstract

This article examines the strategic differences between global branding and local branding in international
marketing, including their advantages and limitations. Using the cases of Nike, Apple, Anta Sports, and Xiaomi, the study
analyzes the impact of branding strategies on market share, revenue growth, consumer loyalty, and competitiveness.
The findings show that global brands benefit from international recognition, consistent image, and premium positioning
opportunities. Local brands gain advantages through cultural adaptation, flexible pricing, and closer consumer
relationships. The study concludes that a hybrid strategy combining global identity with local responsiveness is the most
effective approach for sustainable success in international markets

Author Biographies

Aziz Kurbanovich Abdullaev

Acting Associate Professor
Department of International Finance and Investment
University of World Economy and Diplomacy


Mamasolieva Kamila

University of World Economy and Diplomacy, Faculty of MEM
Major: Foreign Economic Activity

Akhmedova Zaynabkhon Khayrullo qizi

University of World Economy and Diplomacy, Faculty of MEM
Major: Foreign Economic Activity
 

References

1. Nike (2024) Form 10-K Annual Report 2024. Available at: NIKE, Inc. Investor Relations – News, Events and Reports.

2. Apple (2024) Form 10-K Annual Report 2024. Available at: archive.org.

3. Anta Sports (2023) Annual Report 2023. Available at: ir.anta.com/en/financial_report_share.php

4. Xiaomi (2024) Annual Report 2024. Available at: ir.mi.com/financial-information/annual-interim-reports

5. Theodore Levitt (1983) ‘The Globalization of Markets’, Harvard Business Review.

6. Susan P. Douglas and C. Samuel Craig (2011) ‘Convergence and Divergence: Developing a Global Marketing

Strategy’, Journal of International Marketing, 19(1), pp. 82–101.

7. Isabelle Schuiling and Jean-Noël Kapferer (2004) ‘Real Differences Between Local and International Brands’, Journal

of International Marketing, 12(4), pp. 97–112.

8. Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp, Rajeev Batra and Dana L. Alden (2003) ‘How Perceived Brand Globalness Creates

Brand Value’, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), pp. 53–65.

9. Aysegul Özsomer (2012) ‘The Interplay Between Global and Local Brands’, Journal of International Marketing, 20(2),

pp. 72–95.

10. Ilan Alon, Eugene Jaffe, Carsten Prange and Donata Vianelli (2017) Global Marketing: Contemporary Theory, Practice,

and Cases. 2nd edn. Routledge.

11. Aziz Kurbanovich Abdullaev (2025) International Marketing: A Manual. University of World Economy and Diplomacy,

Tashkent. 136 p.

12. International Data Corporation (2025) Worldwide Smartphone Market Share.

13. Deloitte (2023) Global Marketing Trends.

14. Deloitte (2023) Global Marketing Trends.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Abdullaev, A., Mamasolieva, K., & Akhmedova , Z. (2026). GLOBAL BRANDING VS. LOCAL BRANDING: STRATEGIC TRADE-OFFS IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETING. GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20123467
Loading...