O‘ZBEKISTONDA ILM-FANNI MOLIYALASHTIRISHNING HOZIRGI HOLATI VA MAVJUD MUAMMOLAR

Authors

  • Baxtiyer Mirkasimov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22646726

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada O‘zbekistonda ilm-fanni moliyalashtirishning hozirgi holati va ushbu
sohada mavjud muammolar tahlil qilingan. Unda ilmiy-tadqiqot faoliyatini moliyaviy qo‘llab-quvvatlashda davlat
budjeti mablag‘larining o‘rni, ilmiy grantlar va boshqa moliyalashtirish manbalaridan foydalanish imkoniyatlari
yoritilgan. Shuningdek, ilmiy tashkilotlar va oliy ta’lim muassasalarining moliyaviy ta’minoti, ilmiy infratuzilmaning
holati hamda ilmiy loyihalarni moliyalashtirish samaradorligi bilan bog‘liq masalalar ko‘rib chiqilgan. Tadqiqot
davomida moliyaviy resurslarning cheklanganligi, xususiy sektor mablag‘larini ilm-fanga jalb etishning yetarli
darajada rivojlanmaganligi, ilmiy ishlanmalarni tijoratlashtirishdagi muammolar va mablag‘lardan foydalanish
samaradorligini oshirish zarurati asosiy muammolar sifatida qayd etilgan. Shuningdek, ilm-fanni barqaror
moliyalashtirish, muqobil moliyaviy manbalarni kengaytirish va ilmiy-tadqiqot natijalarini amaliyotga joriy etish
bo‘yicha takliflar ilgari surilgan

Keywords

O‘zbekiston, ilm-fan, moliyalashtirish, davlat budjeti, ilmiy-tadqiqot, grantlar, innovatsiya, investitsiya, ilmiy infratuzilma, tijoratlashtirish, ilmiy loyihalar, moliyaviy resurslar.

Author Biography

Baxtiyer Mirkasimov

TDIU mustaqil izlanuvchisi

References

1. David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A

review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4–5), 497–529. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-

7333(99)00087-6.

2. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review.

Research Policy, 2001, 30(3), 509–532. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3.

3. Azoulay, P., Li, D., Graff Zivin, J. S., & Sampat, B. N. Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting:

Evidence from NIH Funding Rules. The Review of Economic Studies, 2019, 86(1), 117–152. DOI: 10.1093/

restud/rdy034.

4. Guimón, J. Policy initiatives to enhance the impact of public research: Promoting excellence, transfer and

co-creation. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 81, 2019. OECD Publishing,

Paris. DOI: 10.1787/a4c9197a-en.

5. Weinryb, N., Blomgren, M., & Wedlin, L. Rationalizing Science: A Comparative Study of Public, Industry,

and Nonprofit Research Funders. Minerva, 2018, 56, 405–429. DOI: 10.1007/s11024-018-9352-6.

6. OECD. Effective operation of competitive research funding systems. OECD Science, Technology and

Industry Policy Papers, No. 57, 2018. OECD Publishing, Paris.

7. OECD. OECD Agenda for Transformative Science, Technology and Innovation Policies. OECD Science,

Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 164, 2024. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/

ba2aaf7b-en.

8. OECD. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2025: Driving Change in a Shifting Landscape.

OECD Publishing, Paris, 2025. DOI: 10.1787/5fe57b90-en.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Mirkasimov , B. (2026). O‘ZBEKISTONDA ILM-FANNI MOLIYALASHTIRISHNING HOZIRGI HOLATI VA MAVJUD MUAMMOLAR. GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT, 4(7), 749–755. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22646726
Vol. 4 No. 7 (2026): «Yashil iqtisodiyot va taraqqiyot» jurnali 7-son