UZOQ MUDDATLI AKTIVLAR SAMARADORLIGINI BAHOLASHNING KO‘RSATKICHLAR TIZIMI (KPI): SHAKLLANTIRILISHI VA MONITORING MEXANIZMI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20638551Keywords:
asosiy ko‘rsatkichlar tizimi (KPI), uzoq muddatli aktivlar, strategik boshqaruv hisobi, balanslangan ko‘rsatkichlar tizimi (BSC), monitoring mexanizmi, transport vositalari parki, SMART tamoyili, neft-gaz tarmog‘i, aktivlar samaradorligi, moliyaviy ko‘rsatkichlarAbstract
Ushbu maqolada uzoq muddatli aktivlar samaradorligini baholashda asosiy ko‘rsatkichlar
tizimi (KPI)ni shakllantirish metodologiyasi va monitoring mexanizmi o‘rganiladi. Neft-gaz sanoatida transport
xizmatlarini ko‘rsatuvchi “Sarbon-Neftegaz” aksiyadorlik jamiyati (134 ta avtomobil parki) misolida moliyaviy
va moliyaviy bo‘lmagan KPI ko‘rsatkichlari tizimini loyihalashtirish, ularni strategik boshqaruv hisobi bilan
uyg‘unlashtirish hamda real vaqt monitoring mexanizmini joriy etish masalalari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Maqolada
Kaplan va Norton BSC konsepsiyasiga asoslangan to‘rtta strategik perspektiva bo‘yicha KPI matritsasi ishlab
chiqiladi va uning “Sarbon-Neftegaz” AJda tatbiq etilishining kutilayotgan samaradorligi baholanadi
References
1. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance // Harvard
Business Review. – 1992. – Vol. 70, No. 1. – P. 71–79.
2. Franco-Santos M., Lucianetti L., Bourne M. Contemporary Performance Measurement Systems: A
Review of Their Consequences and a Framework for Research // Management Accounting Research. – 2012.
– Vol. 23, No. 2. – P. 79–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001.
3. Bourne M., Mills J., Wilcox M., Neely A., Platts K. Designing, Implementing and Updating Performance
Measurement Systems // International Journal of Operations & Production Management. – 2000. – Vol. 20, No.
7. – P. 754–771. DOI: 10.1108/01443570010330739.
4. Nudurupati S.S., Bititci U.S., Kumar V., Chan F.T.S. State of the Art Literature Review on Performance
Measurement // Computers & Industrial Engineering. – 2011. – Vol. 60, No. 2. – P. 279–290. DOI: 10.1016/j.
cie.2010.11.010.
5. Song X., Pan W.-T. Application of Balanced Scorecard in Performance Management and Evaluation of
Listed Companies // Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. – 2022. – Vol. 2022. – Article ID 2247890. – P.
1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2247890.
6. Ionescu Ș., Dumitrescu G.C., Ioanăș C., Delcea C. Mapping the Landscape of Key Performance and
Key Risk Indicators in Business: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis // Risks. – 2024. – Vol. 12, No. 8. –
Article 125. DOI: 10.3390/risks12080125.
7. Pardayev A.X., Pardayeva Z.A. Boshqaruv hisobi: darslik. – Toshkent: “Iqtisod-Moliya”, 2019. – 556 b.
8. IFRS Foundation. IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. – London: IFRS Foundation, 2023.
9. IFRS Foundation. IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. – London: IFRS Foundation, 2023.
10. Ferreira A., Otley D. The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended
Framework for Analysis // Management Accounting Research. – 2009. – Vol. 20, No. 4. – P. 263–282. DOI:
10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003.
11. Micheli P., Manzoni J.-F. Strategic Performance Measurement: Benefits, Limitations and Paradoxes //
Long Range Planning. – 2010. – Vol. 43, No. 4. – P. 465–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.