O‘RMON XO‘JALIGINI MOLIYALASHTIRISHDA MOLIYAVIY RESURSLAR VA MANBALAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17515271Keywords:
o‘rmon xo‘jaligi moliyalashtiruvi; davlat budjeti; donor (ODA/GEF/JB) oqimlari; xususiy investitsiyalar; karbon bozori; PES; MRV; REDD+; Yevropa Ittifoqi (CAP/EAFRD); Markaziy Osiyo; O‘zbekiston; milliy o‘rmon fondiAbstract
Maqolada 2020–2024-yillarda O‘zbekiston, Markaziy Osiyo mamlakatlari va Yevropa Ittifoqida o‘rmon
xo‘jaligini moliyalashtirishning manbalari va instrumentlari tizimli tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot usuli sifatida hujjat tahlili va
ikkilamchi ma’lumotlar ko‘rigi qo‘llanib, moliyaviy oqimlar “davlat-xalqaro-xususiy-karbon/PES” toifalarida kodlandi,
valyuta farqlarini bartaraf etish uchun miqdorlar birxillashtirildi hamda MRV, qo‘shimchalilik va doimiylik kabi indikatorlar
alohida baholandi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, O‘zbekistonda bazaviy moliyalashtirish davlat budjeti hisobidan, landshaft
tiklash va institutsional salohiyat esa donor paketlari orqali jadallashmoqda; Markaziy Osiyoda Qozog‘istonning yong‘in
xavfiga qarshi operatsion xarajatlari sektoral barqarorlikni oshirmoqda, Qirg‘iziston va Tojikistonda kichik grant-kreditlar
hamjamiyatga yo‘naltirilgan boshqaruvni kuchaytiradi. Yevropa Ittifoqida CAP/EAFRD, LIFE va milliy o‘rmon fondlari
(masalan, Avstriya) moslashuvchan, natija-asosli moliyalashtirish modelini taqdim etadi. Mualliflar davlat budjeti, donor
oqimlari, xususiy kapital va karbon/PES instrumentlarini bir “paket”da birlashtirish hamda ularni aniq ko‘rsatkichlar bilan
shartlashni strategik yechim sifatida taklif etadilar.
References
1. Staddon S. Carbon financing and community forestry: A review of the questions, challenges and the case of Nepal //
Journal of Forest and livelihood. – 2009. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – С. 25-32.
2. Šišák L. et al. Analysis of forestry financing in the Czech Republic in the period of transition to market economy //J. For.
Sci. – 2004. – Т. 50. – №. 2. – С. 78-85.
3. Boscolo M., Van Dijk K., Savenije H. Financing sustainable small-scale forestry: lessons from developing national
forest financing strategies in Latin America //Forests. – 2010. – Т. 1. – №. 4. – С. 230-249.
4. Tomaselli I. Brief study on funding and finance for forestry and forest-based sector. – UNFF--United Nations Forum on
Forests, 2006
5. Chipeta, M.E.; Joshi M. Financing sustainable forest management. Report of the International Workshop of Experts.
22–25 January 2001, Oslo, Norway; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2001.
6. Van Bodegom, A.J.; Savenije, H.; Wit, M.; Boot, R.; Saile, P. Forests and climate change: an overview. In Forests and
Climate Change: Adaptation and Mitigation; van Bodegom, A.J., Savenije, H., Wit, M., Eds.; Tropenbos International:
Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2009.
7. Bleaney, A.; Peskett, L.; Mwayafu, D.; REDD-plus after Copenhagen: what does it mean on the ground? REDD-net
COP15 Briefing, 2010. Available online: http://www.redd-net.org (accessed on 19 July 2010).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 YASHIL IQTISODIYOT VA TARAQQIYOT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.