BUXORO TARIXIY MARKAZIDAGI ABDULAZIZXON VA ULUG‘BEK MADRASALARINING TURISTIK SIG‘IM IMKONIYATLARINI BAHOLASH

BUXORO TARIXIY MARKAZIDAGI ABDULAZIZXON VA ULUG‘BEK MADRASALARINING TURISTIK SIG‘IM IMKONIYATLARINI BAHOLASH

Авторы

  • Feruza Ro‘ziqulova
  • Muhriddin Qilichov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20274491

Ключевые слова:

turistik sigʻim, fizik sigʻim, haqiqiy sigʻim, meros obyektlarini boshqarish, YUNESKO Jahon merosi, Cifuentes modeli, barqaror turizm

Аннотация

Ushbu tadqiqot Buxoro tarixiy markazidagi Abdulazizxon va Ulug‘bek madrasalarida turistik sig‘imni
baholashga qaratilgan. Tadqiqotda Cifuentes modeli asosida fizik (PCC) va haqiqiy (RCC) sig‘im ko‘rsatkichlari aniqlangan.
Natijalarga ko‘ra, Abdulazizxon madrasasida fizik sig‘im kuniga 17 451 nafar, haqiqiy sig‘im 10 138 nafarni, Ulug‘bek
madrasasida esa fizik sig‘im kuniga 15 552 nafar, haqiqiy sig‘im 10 020 nafarni tashkil etadi. Tahlillar obyektlar hozircha
sig‘im chegarasidan oshmaganini, ammo iqlim va funksional zonalar sig‘imni cheklovchi asosiy omillar ekanini ko‘rsatdi.
Tadqiqot natijalari asosida turizm oqimini boshqarish va barqaror rivojlanishni ta’minlash bo‘yicha amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab
chiqildi.

Биографии авторов

Feruza Ro‘ziqulova

Turizm va mehmondo‘stlik yo‘nalishi 1-bosqich magistranti
Buxoro davlat universiteti

Muhriddin Qilichov

Turizm va mehmonxona xo‘jaligi kafedrasi o‘qituvchisi, i.f.f.d. (PhD)
Buxoro davlat universiteti

Библиографические ссылки

1. World Travel & Tourism Council. Travel & Tourism Economic Impact Research (EIR) [Elektron resurs].

2. UN Tourism. World Tourism Barometer Data [Elektron resurs].

3. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Milliy statistika qoʻmitasi. 2025–yilda Oʻzbekistonga 11,7 million nafar turist kelgan [Elektron

resurs].

4. Lex.uz. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “Mamlakat taraqqiyotining 2030–yilgacha moʻljallangan ustuvor

yoʻnalishlari doirasida islohotlarni izchil davom ettirish va yangi bosqichga olib chiqishning qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlari

toʻgʻrisida”gi PF–21-son Farmoni, 2026–yil 16–fevral. https://www.lex.uz/uz/docs/-8050769

5. YUNESKO World Heritage Centre. Historic Centre of Bukhara [Elektron resurs].

6. Khamidov O., Khayrullaeva N. Sustainable Tourism Development in the Bukhara Region: A Development Research

Model at Heritage Resources / O. Khamidov, N. Khayrullaeva // Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of

Education. — 2021. — Vol. 1, No. 1. — Maqola havolasi.

7. Kilichov M., Olsavsky F., Baiburiev R., Khayrullaeva N., Dávid L.D. Optimizing Sustainable Tourism Routes through

GIS to Enhance Tourist Length of Stay in Bukhara // Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change. — 2026. — Vol.

11, № 1. — P. 1771–1787. — DOI: 10.64753/jcasc.v11i1.4187.

8. Srivastava N. Measurement of Carrying Capacity of Tourist Destinations: A Case Analysis / N. Srivastava // International

Journal of Tourism and Travel. — 2017. — Vol. 10, No. 1. — P. 38–46.

9. Cifuentes Arias M. Determinación de capacidad de carga turística en áreas protegidas / M. Cifuentes Arias. — Turrialba

(Costa Rica): CATIE, 1992. — 28 p.

10. UNWTO. Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations — A Guidebook. — Madrid: UNWTO, 2004.

— 516 p.

11. Erdoğan A. Carrying Capacity Assessments for Sustainable Tourism in a Heritage Site / A. Erdoğan // Advances in

Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR). — 2025. — Vol. 13, No. 3. — P. 237–274. — DOI: 10.30519/ahtr.1483060.

12. Magablih K., Al-Shorman A. The Physical Carrying Capacity at the Cultural Heritage Site of Petra / K. Magablih, A.

Al-Shorman // Tourism Analysis. — 2009. — Vol. 13, No. 5–6. — P. 511–515. — DOI: 10.3727/108354208788160414.

13. Jangra R., Kaushik S.P. Assessment of Physical Carrying Capacity for Managing Sustainability at Religious Tourist

Destinations / R. Jangra, S.P. Kaushik // International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage. — 2017. — Vol. 5,

Iss. 1, Article 5. — Maqola havolasi.

14. Boullon R. Framework Guidelines for Assessing Carrying Capacity / R. Boullon // FAO Corporate Document Repository.

— 1985. — FAO havolasi.

15. Butler R.W. The Concept of a Tourist Area Cycle of Evolution: Implications for Management of Resources / R.W. Butler

// Canadian Geographer. — 1980. — Vol. 24, No. 1. — P. 5–12.

16. YUNESKO. Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context / YUNESKO, ICCROM,

ICOMOS, IUCN. — Paris: YUNESKO, 2022. — 148 p.

17. Doxey G.V. A Causation Theory of Visitor-Resident Irritants: Methodology and Research Inferences / G.V. Doxey //

Proceedings of the Travel Research Association 6th Annual Conference. — San Diego, 1975. — P. 195–198.

18. Makhadmeh A., Al-Badarneh M., Rawashdeh A., Al-Shorman A. Evaluating the Carrying Capacity at the Archaeological

Site of Jerash (Gerasa) Using Mathematical GIS Modeling / A. Makhadmeh [et al.] // Egyptian Journal of Remote

Sensing and Space Sciences. — 2020. — Vol. 23, No. 2. — P. 159–165. — DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.09.002.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2026-05-01

Как цитировать

Ro‘ziqulova , F., & Qilichov , M. (2026). BUXORO TARIXIY MARKAZIDAGI ABDULAZIZXON VA ULUG‘BEK MADRASALARINING TURISTIK SIG‘IM IMKONIYATLARINI BAHOLASH. ЗЕЛЁНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА И РАЗВИТИЕ, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20274491
Loading...