DAVLAT ISHTIROKIDAGI KORXONALARDA RAQAMLI TRANSFORMATSIYANING INVESTITSIYA SAMARADORLIGIGA TA’SIRI: NAZARIY ASOSLAR VA EMPIRIK TAHLIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20776709Keywords:
davlat ishtirokidagi korxonalar; raqamli transformatsiya; investitsiya samaradorligi; axborot assimetriyasi; agentlik nazariyasi; panel ma’lumotlar; haddan ortiq investitsiya; two-way fixed effects; O‘zbekistonAbstract
Ushbu maqolada davlat ishtirokidagi korxonalarda (DIK) raqamli transformatsiyaning investitsiya
samaradorligiga ta’siri nazariy va empirik jihatdan o‘rganiladi. Tadqiqot natijasi sifatida raqamli transformatsiyaning haddan
ortiq investitsiya (overinvestment) hamda yetarli darajada investitsiya qilmaslik (underinvestment) muammolariga ta’sirini
izohlash uchun konseptual model va bir nechta gipotezalar ishlab chiqildi. Ushbu gipotezalarni tekshirish maqsadida panel
ma’lumotlarga asoslangan ikki tomonlama qat’iy ta’sirlar (two-way fixed effects) regressiya modeli taklif etiladi. Xalqaro
empirik tadqiqotlar — xususan, Xitoy, Yevropa va Markaziy Osiyo mamlakatlari bo‘yicha 2012–2024-yillar oralig‘idagi
ma’lumotlar — tahlil qilinib, raqamli transformatsiya indeksining investitsiya samaradorligiga statistik jihatdan sezilarli ijobiy
ta’sir ko‘rsatishi aniqlandi. Axborot assimetriyasini kamaytirish, moliyaviy cheklovlarni yumshatish va agentlik xarajatlarini
qisqartirish raqamli transformatsiya ta’sirining uchta asosiy kanali sifatida belgilandi. O‘zbekiston uchun qiyosiy tahlil va
siyosat tavsiyalari ham keltirilgan.
References
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 5-oktabrdagi PF-6079-son Farmoni. “Raqamli
O‘zbekiston — 2030” strategiyasini tasdiqlash va uni samarali amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida.
– URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-5030957
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 28-dekabrdagi PQ-459-son Qarori. O‘zbekiston
Respublikasining 2023–2025-yillarga mo‘ljallangan investitsiya dasturini amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlari
to‘g‘risida. – URL: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-6329448
3. Wu M., Zhu T. Firm Digital Transformation and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from China // Discrete
Dynamics in Nature and Society. – 2026. – Vol. 2026. – P. 1–19. DOI: 10.1155/ddns/1987061.
4. Guo P., Bi J., Zhu M. Enterprise digital transformation and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence
from listed enterprises in China // Journal of Asian Economics. – 2025. – Vol. 97. – Article 101892. DOI:
10.1016/j.asieco.2025.101892.
5. Peng Z., Zhang H., Zhou P., Ren J., Chen Y. Enterprise digital transformation and inefficient investment:
From the perspective of diversified operations and environmental uncertainty // Humanities and Social
Sciences Communications. – 2025. – Vol. 12. – Article 1–16. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05591-4.
6. Liu S., Wu Y., Yin X., Wu B. Digital transformation and labour investment efficiency: Heterogeneity across
the enterprise life cycle // Finance Research Letters. – 2023. – Vol. 58. – Article 104537. DOI: 10.1016/j.
frl.2023.104537.
7. Jin X., Wu Y. How does digital transformation affect the ESG performance of Chinese manufacturing stateowned
enterprises? // PLOS ONE. – 2024. – Vol. 19, No. 5. – Article e0301864. DOI: 10.1371/journal.
pone.0301864.
8. Huang S., Yu H., Zhang Z., Feng Y. Can state ownership help facilitate the digital transformation of private
sector enterprises? Evidence from China // Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. – 2025. –
Vol. 12. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04536-1.
9. Zhang S. The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixedownership
reform: The evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises // Corporate Social Responsibility
and Environmental Management. – 2024. – Vol. 31, No. 3. – P. 2195–2210. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2656.
10. Liu X., He L. Digital transformation, external financing, and enterprise resource allocation efficiency //
Managerial and Decision Economics. – 2024. – Vol. 45, No. 4. – P. 2321–2335. DOI: 10.1002/mde.4136.
11. Chen Z., Cao Y., Liao K. How state-owned equity participation promotes the digital transformation of
nonstate-owned enterprises: Evidence from China // Finance Research Letters. – 2024. – Vol. 59. – Article
104818. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104818.
12. Fang Z. A Literature Review on the Digital Transformation of State-owned Enterprises // International
Journal of Global Economics and Management. – 2024. – Vol. 5, No. 3. – P. 210–218. DOI: 10.62051/
ijgem.v5n3.24.
13. Richardson S. Over-investment of free cash flow // Review of Accounting Studies. – 2006. – Vol. 11. – P.
159–189. DOI: 10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1.
14. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure //
Journal of Financial Economics. – 1976. – Vol. 3, No. 4. – P. 305–360. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
15. Myers S.C., Majluf N.S. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that
investors do not have // Journal of Financial Economics. – 1984. – Vol. 13, No. 2. – P. 187–221. DOI:
10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0.
16. Jensen M.C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers // American Economic
Review. – 1986. – Vol. 76, No. 2. – P. 323–329.
17. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:
Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. –
1986. – Vol. 51, No. 6. – P. 1173–1182. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.