Strategic alliance networks as competitive advantage: evidence from mit-tum partnership model at new Uzbekistan university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16420503Ключевые слова:
strategic alliances, network theory, competitive advantage, university partnerships, emerging marketsАннотация
This paper examines how strategic alliance networks create competitive advantages for emerging universities
pursuing rapid internationalization. Using New Uzbekistan University’s simultaneous partnerships with MIT and Technical
University of Munich as a case study, the research applies network theory and strategic management frameworks to
analyze multi-partner collaboration models. Findings reveal that dual elite partnerships generate synergistic effects
exceeding single alliances through four mechanisms: complementary capability access, reputation spillovers, network
bridging, and resource leverage. The MIT partnership provides innovation ecosystem access and pedagogical expertise,
while TUM collaboration enables systematic quality frameworks and European network integration. Presidential Decree
PQ-151’s support mechanisms amplify partnership benefits through co-funding requirements and regulatory flexibility. The
study contributes to strategic management literature by demonstrating how emerging market organizations can overcome
latecomer disadvantages through carefully orchestrated alliance portfolios. Practical implications include frameworks for
partner selection, integration management, and performance measurement in complex multi-stakeholder environments
Библиографические ссылки
1. Y. Doz and G. Hamel, Alliance Advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
2. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive
advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
3. Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance
formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.
4. Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view.
Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638–658.
5. Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management
Review, 30(1), 146–165.
6. Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research
Policy, 31(4), 477–492..
7. R. Burt, Structural Holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
8. A. Wassmer, “Alliance portfolios: A review and research agenda,” Journal of Management, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 141-171,
2010.
9. E. Hazelkorn, Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education, 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
10. Republic of Uzbekistan, “Concept for Development of Higher Education System until 2030,” Presidential Decree
UP-5847, 2019.
11. S. Marginson, “University rankings and social science,” European Journal of Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 45-59, 2014.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 YASHIL IQTISODIYOT VA TARAQQIYOT

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.