ENSURING SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE TRANSITION TO A GREEN ECONOMY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARBON EMISSIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17577312##semicolon##
green economy transition, carbon emissions, economic development, econometric analysis, sustainable growth, CO₂ emissions, GDP-emissions nexus, ordinary least squares, decoupling strategy, cement emissions, oil consumption, environmental sustainability, policy implications, diagnostic testing##article.abstract##
This study employs econometric analysis to examine the complex relationship between carbon emissions and
economic development during the transition to a green economy. Using time-series data from 1990 to 2022, we estimate
three distinct Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) models to investigate the emissions-growth nexus. The analysis reveals
that Model 3 (GDP predicted by emission sources) demonstrates superior explanatory power (R² = 0.9475, p < 0.001)
compared to basic emissions-GDP relationships. Key findings indicate that cement CO₂ emissions exhibit a statistically
significant positive relationship with economic growth (β = 0.0545, p < 0.001), while oil CO₂ emissions show a significant
negative association (β = -0.0058, p < 0.001). Coal, gas, and flaring emissions demonstrate statistically insignificant effects
on GDP. Diagnostic tests confirm model validity through normality (Shapiro-Wilk p > 0.05), homoscedasticity (Breusch-
Pagan p > 0.05), and acceptable multicollinearity levels (VIF < 5.4), though autocorrelation concerns were identified. The
results suggest that strategic decoupling is feasible, with cement industry modernization and oil consumption reduction
presenting key leverage points for sustainable growth. This research provides empirical evidence for policymakers
to design targeted strategies that balance economic development with environmental sustainability, supporting the
hypothesis that selective emission reduction can coexist with economic progress during the green transition.
##submission.citations##
1. Adebayo, T. S., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological
innovation on environmental degradation in South Africa: Evidence from heterogeneous panel analysis. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research, 28(4), 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10512-7
2. Al-mulali, U., Saboori, B., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam.
Energy Policy, 76, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019
3. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: Evidence from the
commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy, 38(1), 650–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.029
4. Baek, J., & Pride, D. (2014). On the income–energy–emissions relationship: An empirical analysis of developed
and developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16(5), 1067–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10668-014-9515-3
5. Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., & Bulut, Ü. (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A
revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838–845. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
6. Cosmas, N. C., Chitedze, I., & Mourad, K. A. (2019). An econometric analysis of the macroeconomic determinants
of carbon dioxide emissions in Nigeria. Science of The Total Environment, 675, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
scitotenv.2019.04.188
7. Dogan, E., & Turkekul, B. (2016). CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial
development: Testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1203–
1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
8. Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in
Turkey. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012
9. Hasanov, F. J., Liddle, B., & Mikayilov, J. I. (2018). The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting
countries: Evidence from the smooth transition autoregressive model. Energy Economics, 74, 554–563. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.013
10. Lu, Q., Farooq, M. U., & Ma, X. (2024). The nexus between CO2 emissions and economic growth in the United States:
New insights from MIDAS regressions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(5), 6865–6878. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11356-023-31423-4
11. Magazzino, C., Mele, M., & Morelli, G. (2020). The relationship between renewable energy and economic growth in a
time of Covid-19: A machine learning approach. Sustainability, 13(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010074
12. Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220–3225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005
13. Ozturk, I., & Al-Mulali, U. (2015). Natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus: Panel data analysis for GCC
countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 998–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.005
14. Pandey, S., Dogan, E., & Taskin, D. (2018). Revisiting the relationship between environmental and economic
performance: The role of trade openness in Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(35),
35228–35239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3453-3
15. Rafique, M. Z., Li, Y., & Murshed, M. (2022). Environmental sustainability and economic growth in Belt and Road
Initiative economies: The mediating role of technological innovation. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 963–977.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2290
16. Saidi, K., & Hammami, S. (2015). The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58
countries. Energy Reports, 1, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2015.01.003
17. Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., & Azim, P. (2013). Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy
consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.012
18. Solarin, S. A. (2017). The role of urbanization in the relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions:
Evidence from African countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(32), 24792–24805. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11356-017-0089-7
19. Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to
environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
enpol.2008.08.025
20. Tamazian, A., & Rao, B. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental
degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
eneco.2009.04.004
21. Zhang, Y. J., & Cheng, H. S. (2009). Environmental Kuznets curve: A spatial econometric approach for China. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 17(8), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.005
##submission.downloads##
##submissions.published##
##issue.issue##
##section.section##
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##