TA’LIM KLASTERLARI KONTEKSTIDA BOSHQARUVNING ZAMONAVIY MUAMMOLARI VA STRATEGIK YECHIMLARI: TRIPLE HELIX MODELI ASOSIDA TAHLIL
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17421423##article.subject##:
ta’lim klasteri, raqamli transformatsiya, Triple Helix, boshqaruv, innovatsiyalar, barqaror rivojlanish, strategik yechimlar.##article.abstract##
Raqamli transformatsiya jarayonlari jadal rivojlanayotgan bugungi davrda ta’lim klasterlari innovatsion
rivojlanish va raqobatbardoshlikni oshirishning muhim omillaridan biri sifatida maydonga chiqmoqda. Ushbu maqolada
ta’lim klasterlarida boshqaruvning zamonaviy muammolari tahlil qilinadi hamda ularni hal etish bo‘yicha strategik
yechimlar taklif etiladi. Tadqiqotda Triple Helix modeli (universitet–biznes–davlat) asosida klaster ishtirokchilarining o‘zaro
hamkorlik imkoniyatlari o‘rganiladi. Shuningdek, innovatsiyalarni tijoratlashtirish, ilmiy salohiyatni oshirish va klasterlarning
iqtisodiy samaradorligini kuchaytirish bo‘yicha ustuvor yo‘nalishlar belgilab beriladi. Natijalar ta’lim va biznes o‘rtasidagi
integratsiyani rivojlantirish hamda barqaror iqtisodiy o‘sishga erishishga xizmat qiladi
Библиографические ссылки
1. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple
Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-
7333(99)00055-4
2. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-
415-26091-9. 164 p.
3. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st Century Fractal
Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/
IJTM.2009.023374
4. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do
Knowledge, Innovation and Environment Relate To Each Other?. International Journal of Social Ecology and
Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
5. Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in
the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(3), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
6. Schütz, F., Heidingsfelder, M. L., & Schraudner, M. (2019). Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation
Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design,
Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002
7. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming
as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.
org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
8. Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning.
Anthem Press. ISBN: 978-0-85728-674-1. 404 p.
Загрузки
##submissions.published##
Как цитировать
##issue.issue##
##section.section##
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 YASHIL IQTISODIYOT VA TARAQQIYOT
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.