O‘ZBEKISTONDA IQTISODIY O‘SISH VA CO₂ EMISSIYASI: EKOLOGIK KUZNETS EGRI CHIZIG‘I (EKC) ASOSIDA TAHLIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20137042Keywords:
Ekologik Kuznets egri chizig‘i (EKC), CO₂ emissiyasi, iqtisodiy o‘sish, YaIM, kvadratik model, O‘zbekiston, atrof-muhit ifloslanishi, barqaror rivojlanish, energiya samaradorligi, ekologik siyosat, teskari U-shaklidagi bog‘liqlik, yashil iqtisodiyot.Abstract
Ushbu maqola O‘zbekistonda iqtisodiy o‘sish va CO₂ emissiyasi o‘rtasidagi bog‘liqlikni Ekologik Kuznets
egri chizig‘i (EKC) modeli asosida tahlil qilishga bag‘ishlangan. EKC gipotezasiga ko‘ra, iqtisodiy rivojlanishning dastlabki
bosqichlarida atrof-muhit ifloslanishi ortadi, ma’lum daromad darajasiga yetgandan so‘ng esa ekologik bosim kamayishni
boshlaydi. Tadqiqotda O‘zbekistonning 2000–2023-yillardagi yalpi ichki mahsulot (YaIM) va CO₂ emissiyasi ko‘rsatkichlari
tahlil qilingan. Kvadratik regressiya modeli qo‘llanilib, YaIM va uning kvadrati mustaqil o‘zgaruvchilar, CO₂ emissiyasi esa
bog‘liq o‘zgaruvchi sifatida olingan. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatdiki, O‘zbekistonda EKC gipotezasi qisman tasdiqlanadi: YaIM
o‘sishi bilan CO₂ emissiyasi ham ortgan
References
1. Gene Grossman and Alan Krueger (1991) Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER
Working Paper, No. 3914.
2. Theodore Panayotou (1993) Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of
Economic Development. ILO Working Paper.
3. David Stern (2004) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, World Development, 32(8), pp. 1419–
1439.
4. Soumyananda Dinda (2004) ‘Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey’, Ecological Economics, 49(4), pp.
431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
5. Abdul Jalil and Syed Mahmud (2009) ‘Environment Kuznets Curve for CO₂ Emissions: A Cointegration Analysis’,
Energy Policy, 37(12), pp. 5167–5172.
6. Erdoğan Doğan and Abdullah Aslan (2017) ‘Exploring the Relationship among CO₂ Emissions, Real GDP, Energy
Consumption and Tourism in the EU and Candidate Countries’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, pp.
239–245.
7. Muhammad Ahmad et al. (2018) ‘Carbon Emissions, Energy Use, Gross Domestic Product and Total Population in
China’, Economics and Environment, 65, p. 13.
8. D. Pachiyappan et al. (2021) ‘Short and Long-Run Causal Effects of CO₂ Emissions, Energy Use, GDP and Population
Growth: Evidence from India’, Energies, 14, p. 8333.
9. A. Raximov (2023) ‘The Impact of Economic Growth on Air Pollution in Uzbekistan: An Empirical Analysis’, Economic
Development and Analysis, 1, pp. 131–139.
10. S. Muqimov (2026) O‘zbekistonda karbonat angidrid emissiyasining makroiqtisodiy determinantlari: ARDL yondashuvi.
Toshkent davlat iqtisodiyot universiteti.
11. J. Karimov (2024) ‘O‘zbekistonda yashil iqtisodiyot rivojlanishi va ekologik barqarorlik masalalari’, O‘zbekiston iqtisodiy
tadqiqotlar jurnali, 2(5), pp. 55–63.
12. International Energy Agency (2024) CO₂ Emissions from Fuel Combustion. Available at: https://www.iea.org
13. World Bank (2024) World Development Indicators. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org
14. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Davlat statistika qo‘mitasi (2023) Statistik yillik to‘plam.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.