INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION EFFECTIVENESS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OECD COUNTRIES’ EXPERIENCE IN GOVERNANCE FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM

Sarvar Saidov

doi:10.5281/zenodo.18290960

INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION EFFECTIVENESS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OECD COUNTRIES’ EXPERIENCE IN GOVERNANCE FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM

##article.authors##

Sarvar Saidov

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18290960

##semicolon##

public administration, efficiency, institutionalization, governance reform, accountability, digital governance, efficiency framework, public sector reform

##article.abstract##

This article examines the institutionalization of government effectiveness in the context of public sector reforms,
drawing on comparative evidence from OECD countries with focused cases from the United States, the United Kingdom,
and Singapore. Using institutional and comparative analysis, the study identifies transferable governance principles,
coordination mechanisms, and digital enablers, while highlighting key risks of performance management. The findings
offer analytically grounded insights for adapting international experience to national reform contexts

##submission.authorBiography##

Sarvar Saidov

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Economics
Senior Specialist at the Center for the Assessment
of Managerial Personnel under the Agency for Public Administration
Effectiveness under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan

##submission.citations##

1. World Bank. Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. — Washington, DC: World Bank,

2020–2023.

2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Public Governance Reviews: Towards Efficient

and Trust-Based Public Administration. — Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017.

3. Указ Президента Республики Узбекистан от 6 декабря 2025 года № УП–243 «О мерах по дальнейшему повышению

эффективности управления в государственной службе» // Национальная база данных законодательства

Республики Узбекистан (Lex.uz). https://lex.uz/ru/docs/7922203

4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Government at a Glance. — Paris: OECD

Publishing, 2019–2023.

5. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Public Administration Reform and Anti-Corruption: Linking

Performance, Accountability and Trust. — New York: UNDP, 2018.

6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries. —

Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

7. Kamarck, E. C. Lessons for the Future of Government Reform: The National Performance Review Experience. —

Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2013.

8. Hood, C., Dixon, R. A Government That Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and

Change in UK Central Government. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

9. Civil Service College Singapore. Performance Management and Leadership Development in the Public Service. —

Singapore: Civil Service College, analytical reports, 2016–2022.

10. World Bank. GovTech: Putting People First — Public Sector Reform through Digital Transformation. — Washington,

DC: World Bank, 2020.

INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION EFFECTIVENESS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OECD COUNTRIES’ EXPERIENCE IN GOVERNANCE FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM

INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION EFFECTIVENESS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OECD COUNTRIES’ EXPERIENCE IN GOVERNANCE FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM

##article.authors##

##semicolon##

##semicolon##

##article.abstract##

##submission.authorBiography##

Sarvar Saidov

##submission.citations##

##submission.downloads##

##submissions.published##

##submission.howToCite##

##issue.issue##

##section.section##

##submission.license##